CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10384 – jenkins: CSRF protection tokens for anonymous users did not expire in some circumstances (SECURITY-1491)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10384
Jenkins 2.191 and earlier, LTS 2.176.2 and earlier allowed users to obtain CSRF tokens without an associated web session ID, resulting in CSRF tokens that did not expire and could be used to bypass CSRF protection for the anonymous user. Jenkins 2.191 y anteriores, LTS 2.176.2 y anteriores permitieron a los usuarios obtener tokens CSRF sin un ID de sesión web asociado, lo que resultó en tokens CSRF que no caducaron y podrían usarse para omitir la protección CSRF para el usuario anónimo. A flaw was found in Jenkins. Users are allowed to obtain CSRF tokens without an associated web session ID, resulting in CSRF tokens that did not expire and could be used to bypass CSRF protection for the anonymous user. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/08/28/4 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2789 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3144 https://jenkins.io/security/advisory/2019-08-28/#SECURITY-1491 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10384 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747297 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •
CVSS: 4.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10383 – jenkins: stored cross-site scripting in update center web pages (SECURITY-1453)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10383
A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in Jenkins 2.191 and earlier, LTS 2.176.2 and earlier allowed attackers with Overall/Administer permission to configure the update site URL to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript in update center web pages. Una vulnerabilidad de secuencias de comandos entre sitios almacenada en Jenkins 2.191 y anteriores, LTS 2.176.2 y anteriores permitía a los atacantes con permiso General / Administrar configurar la URL del sitio de actualización para inyectar HTML y JavaScript arbitrarios en las páginas web del centro de actualizaciones. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/08/28/4 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2789 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3144 https://jenkins.io/security/advisory/2019-08-28/#SECURITY-1453 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747293 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2019-11247 – Kubernetes kube-apiserver allows access to custom resources via wrong scope
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11247
The Kubernetes kube-apiserver mistakenly allows access to a cluster-scoped custom resource if the request is made as if the resource were namespaced. Authorizations for the resource accessed in this manner are enforced using roles and role bindings within the namespace, meaning that a user with access only to a resource in one namespace could create, view update or delete the cluster-scoped resource (according to their namespace role privileges). Kubernetes affected versions include versions prior to 1.13.9, versions prior to 1.14.5, versions prior to 1.15.2, and versions 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11, 1.12. El kube-apiserver de Kubernetes permite por error el acceso a un recurso personalizado de ámbito de clúster si la solicitud se realiza como si el recurso estuviera con espacio de nombres. Las autorizaciones para el recurso al que se tiene acceso de esta manera se aplican mediante roles y enlaces de roles dentro del espacio de nombres, lo que significa que un usuario con acceso solo a un recurso en un espacio de nombres podría crear, ver actualizar o eliminar el recurso de ámbito de clúster (según sus privilegios de rol de espacio de nombres). • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2816 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2824 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2690 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2769 https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/80983 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/kubernetes-security-announce/vUtEcSEY6SM/v2ZZxsmtFQAJ https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190919-0003 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-11247 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9515 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9515
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2766 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2796 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2861 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 79%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9514 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9514
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de reinicio, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante abre una serie de secuencias y envía una solicitud no válida sobre cada secuencia que debería solicitar una secuencia de tramas RST_STREAM del par. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •