Page 19 of 101 results (0.018 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0

In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization. En Eclipse Jetty Server, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones que no sean HTTP/1.x) y versiones 9.4.x (todas las configuraciones HTTP/1.x), cuando se presentan con dos cabeceras content-lengths, Jetty ignora la segunda. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106566 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535669 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread& • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0

In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. En Eclipse Jetty, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones) y versiones 9.4.x (configuración personalizada con el cumplimiento RFC2616 habilitado), los fragmentos transfer-encoding se gestionan de forma incorrecta. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0910 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535668 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache. • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 through 9.4.8, when using the optional Jetty provided FileSessionDataStore for persistent storage of HttpSession details, it is possible for a malicious user to access/hijack other HttpSessions and even delete unmatched HttpSessions present in the FileSystem's storage for the FileSessionDataStore. En Eclipse Jetty, desde la versión 9.4.0 hasta la 9.4.8, al emplear el FileSessionDataStore opcional provisto por Jetty para el almacenamiento persistente de detalles HttpSession, es posible que un usuario malicioso acceda/secuestre otras HttpSessions e incluso elimine HttpSessions sin coincidencias presentes en el almacenamiento FileSystem para FileSessionDataStore. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=536018 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181014-0001 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html • CWE-6: J2EE Misconfiguration: Insufficient Session-ID Length CWE-384: Session Fixation •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 2

lodash node module before 4.17.5 suffers from a Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID) vulnerability via defaultsDeep, merge, and mergeWith functions, which allows a malicious user to modify the prototype of "Object" via __proto__, causing the addition or modification of an existing property that will exist on all objects. El módulo de node lodash en versiones anteriores a la 4.17.5 se ve afectada por una vulnerabilidad MAID (modificación de datos asumidos como asumible) mediante las funciones "defaultsDeep", "merge" y "mergeWith", lo que permite que un usuario malicioso modifique el prototipo de "Object" mediante __proto__, provocando la adición o modificación de una propiedad existente que va a existir en todos los objetos. • https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2018-3721 https://github.com/lodash/lodash/commit/d8e069cc3410082e44eb18fcf8e7f3d08ebe1d4a https://hackerone.com/reports/310443 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190919-0004 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-3721 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545884 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-471: Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID) CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •

CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 97%CPEs: 1467EXPL: 3

Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis. Los sistemas con microprocesadores con ejecución especulativa y predicción de ramas podrían permitir la revelación no autorizada de información al atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de un canal lateral. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). There are three primary variants of the issue which differ in the way the speculative execution can be exploited. Variant CVE-2017-5753 triggers the speculative execution by performing a bounds-check bypass. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43427 https://github.com/sachinthaBS/Spectre-Vulnerability-CVE-2017-5753- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00007.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00008.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00016.html http://nvidia.custhe • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •