CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 81%CPEs: 84EXPL: 2CVE-2016-3715 – ImageMagick Arbitrary File Deletion Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3715
The EPHEMERAL coder in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a crafted image. El codificador EPHEMERAL en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permite a atacantes remotos eliminar archivos arbitrarios a través de una imagen manipulada. It was discovered that certain ImageMagick coders and pseudo-protocols did not properly prevent security sensitive operations when processing specially crafted images. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted image that, when processed by an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities, would allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that could allow users to delete files by using ImageMagick's 'ephemeral' pseudo protocol, which deletes files after reading. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 79%CPEs: 19EXPL: 2CVE-2016-3716 – ImageMagick 7.0.1-0 / 6.9.3-9 - 'ImageTragick ' Multiple Vulnerabilities
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3716
The MSL coder in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allows remote attackers to move arbitrary files via a crafted image. El codificador MSL en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permite a atacantes remotos mover archivos arbitrarios a través de una imagen manipulada. It was discovered that certain ImageMagick coders and pseudo-protocols did not properly prevent security sensitive operations when processing specially crafted images. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted image that, when processed by an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities, would allow the attacker to move arbitrary files. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0726.html http://www.debian.o • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 93%CPEs: 84EXPL: 1CVE-2016-3718 – ImageMagick Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3718
The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. Los codificadores (1) HTTP y (2) FTP en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permiten a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de falsificación de peticiones del lado del servidor (SSRF) a través de una imagen manipulada. A server-side request forgery flaw was discovered in the way ImageMagick processed certain images. A remote attacker could exploit this flaw to mislead an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities into, for example, performing HTTP(S) requests or opening FTP sessions via specially crafted images. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows attackers to perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) via a crafted image. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3627 – libxml2: stack exhaustion while parsing xml files in recovery mode
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3627
The xmlStringGetNodeList function in tree.c in libxml2 2.9.3 and earlier, when used in recovery mode, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite recursion, stack consumption, and application crash) via a crafted XML document. La función xmlStringGetNodeList en tree.c en libxml2.2.9.3 y versiones anteriores, cuando se utiliza en modo de recuperación, permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (bucle infinito, consumo de pila y caída de la aplicación) a través de un docuumento XML manipulado. Missing recursive loop detection checks were found in the xmlParserEntityCheck() and xmlStringGetNodeList() functions of libxml2, causing application using the library to crash by stack exhaustion while building the associated data. An attacker able to send XML data to be parsed in recovery mode could launch a Denial of Service on the application. libxml versions prior to 2.9.3 suffer from a stack overflow vulnerability when parsing a malicious file. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-05/msg00055.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-05/msg00127.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/May/10 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/03/21/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/03/21/3 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016& • CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 8%CPEs: 61EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2105 – openssl: EVP_EncodeUpdate overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2105
Integer overflow in the EVP_EncodeUpdate function in crypto/evp/encode.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of binary data. Desbordamiento de entero en la función EVP_EncodeUpdate en crypto/evp/encode.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1t y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2h permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (corrupción de memoria dinámica) a través de una gran cantidad de datos binarios. An integer overflow flaw, leading to a buffer overflow, was found in the way the EVP_EncodeUpdate() function of OpenSSL parsed very large amounts of input data. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash an application using OpenSSL or, possibly, execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the user running that application. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183457.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183607.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184605.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/ • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •