CVE-2024-39205 – Pyload Remote Code Execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-39205
CVE-2024-28397 is a sandbox escape in js2py versions 0.74 and below. js2py is a popular python package that can evaluate javascript code inside a python interpreter. The vulnerability allows for an attacker to obtain a reference to a python object in the js2py environment enabling them to escape the sandbox, bypass pyimport restrictions and execute arbitrary commands on the host. ... This endpoint was designed to only accept connections from localhost but by manipulating the HOST header we can bypass this restriction in order to access the API to achieve unauthenticated remote code execution. • https://github.com/Marven11/CVE-2024-39205-Pyload-RCE https://github.com/Marven11/CVE-2024-39205-Pyload-RCE/tree/main https://github.com/pyload/pyload https://github.com/pyload/pyload/security/advisories/GHSA-r9pp-r4xf-597r - •
CVE-2024-7024
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-7024
Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 126.0.6478.54 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. • https://issues.chromium.org/issues/334120897 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVE-2024-45411 – Twig has a possible sandbox bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-45411
Under some circumstances, the sandbox security checks are not run which allows user-contributed templates to bypass the sandbox restrictions. • https://github.com/twigphp/Twig/commit/11f68e2aeb526bfaf638e30d4420d8a710f3f7c6 https://github.com/twigphp/Twig/commit/2102dd135986db79192d26fb5f5817a566e0a7de https://github.com/twigphp/Twig/commit/7afa198603de49d147e90d18062e7b9addcf5233 https://github.com/twigphp/Twig/security/advisories/GHSA-6j75-5wfj-gh66 • CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure •
CVE-2023-50883
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-50883
ONLYOFFICE Docs before 8.0.1 allows XSS because a macro is an immediately-invoked function expression (IIFE), and therefore a sandbox escape is possible by directly calling the constructor of the Function object. • https://www.onlyoffice.com https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2023-027.txt https://www.syss.de/pentest-blog/cross-site-scripting-schwachstelle-in-onlyoffice-docs-syss-2023-027 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVE-2024-43102 – umtx Kernel panic or Use-After-Free
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-43102
Concurrent removals of certain anonymous shared memory mappings by using the UMTX_SHM_DESTROY sub-request of UMTX_OP_SHM can lead to decreasing the reference count of the object representing the mapping too many times, causing it to be freed too early. A malicious code exercizing the UMTX_SHM_DESTROY sub-request in parallel can panic the kernel or enable further Use-After-Free attacks, potentially including code execution or Capsicum sandbox escape. • https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-24:14.umtx.asc • CWE-416: Use After Free CWE-911: Improper Update of Reference Count •