CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2019-17559 – Debian Security Advisory 4672-1
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17559
23 Mar 2020 — There is a vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.3, 7.0.0 to 7.1.8, and 8.0.0 to 8.0.5 with a smuggling attack and scheme parsing. Upgrade to versions 7.1.9 and 8.0.6 or later versions. Se presenta una vulnerabilidad en Apache Traffic Server versiones 6.0.0 hasta 6.2.3, versiones 7.0.0 hasta 7.1.8 y versiones 8.0.0 hasta 8.0.5, con un ataque de tráfico no autorizado y análisis de esquemas. Actualice a las versiones 7.1.9 y 8.0.6 o versiones posteriores. Several vulnerabilities were discovered ... • https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r99d18d0bc4daa05e7d0e5a63e0e22701a421b2ef5a8f4f7694c43869%40%3Cannounce.trafficserver.apache.org%3E • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2019-17565 – Debian Security Advisory 4672-1
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17565
23 Mar 2020 — There is a vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.3, 7.0.0 to 7.1.8, and 8.0.0 to 8.0.5 with a smuggling attack and chunked encoding. Upgrade to versions 7.1.9 and 8.0.6 or later versions. Se presenta una vulnerabilidad en Apache Traffic Server versiones 6.0.0 hasta 6.2.3, versiones 7.0.0 hasta 7.1.8 y versiones 8.0.0 hasta 8.0.5, con un ataque de tráfico no autorizado y codificación fragmentada. Actualice a las versiones 7.1.9 y 8.0.6 o versiones posteriores. Several vulnerabilities were disco... • https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r99d18d0bc4daa05e7d0e5a63e0e22701a421b2ef5a8f4f7694c43869%40%3Cannounce.trafficserver.apache.org%3E • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10079
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10079
22 Oct 2019 — Apache Traffic Server is vulnerable to HTTP/2 setting flood attacks. Earlier versions of Apache Traffic Server didn't limit the number of setting frames sent from the client using the HTTP/2 protocol. Users should upgrade to Apache Traffic Server 7.1.7, 8.0.4, or later versions. Apache Traffic Server es vulnerable a los ataques de inundación de la configuración HTTP/2. Las versiones anteriores de Apache Traffic Server no limitaban el número de tramas de configuración enviadas desde el cliente utilizando el ... • https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/392108390cef48af647a2e47b7fd5380e050e35ae8d1aa2030254c04%40%3Cusers.trafficserver.apache.org%3E • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9516 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9516
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una fuga de encabezado, lo que puede conducir a una denega... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 45%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9512 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9512
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a las inundaciones de ping, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante envía pings continuos a un par HTTP / 2, haciendo que el... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 8%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9517 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9517
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones HT... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00004.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9518 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9518
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 18%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9515 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9515
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 20%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9513 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9513
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a los bucles de recursos, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante crea múltiples flujos de solicitud y baraja continuamente la prioridad de ... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 27%CPEs: 39EXPL: 1CVE-2019-9511 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9511
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a la manip... • https://github.com/flyniu666/ingress-nginx-0.21-1.19.5 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •