Page 2 of 1014 results (0.014 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 13%CPEs: 35EXPL: 2

A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from Lua scripts). The Apache httpd team is not aware of an exploit for the vulnerabilty though it might be possible to craft one. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier. Un cuerpo de petición cuidadosamente diseñado puede causar un desbordamiento de búfer en el analizador multiparte mod_lua (r:parsebody() llamado desde scripts Lua). El equipo de Apache httpd no presenta constancia de que se presente una explotación para esta vulnerabilidad, aunque podría ser posible diseñar uno. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51193 https://github.com/nuPacaChi/-CVE-2021-44790 http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/171631/Apache-2.4.x-Buffer-Overflow.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/20/4 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 45EXPL: 1

curl supports the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS`in libcurl. This rarely used option is used to send variable=content pairs toTELNET servers.Due to flaw in the option parser for sending `NEW_ENV` variables, libcurlcould be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to theserver. Therefore potentially revealing sensitive internal information to theserver using a clear-text network protocol.This could happen because curl did not call and use sscanf() correctly whenparsing the string provided by the application. curl soporta la opción de línea de comandos "-t", conocida como "CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS" en libcurl. Debido a un fallo en el analizador de opciones para el envío de variables "NEW_ENV", libcurl podría pasar datos no inicializados de un búfer en la región stack de la memoria al servidor. Por lo tanto, podría revelar potencialmente información interna confidencial al servidor usando un protocolo de red de texto sin cifrar. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/39 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/40 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-484086.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1223882 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FRUCW2UVNYUDZF72DQLFQR4PJEC6CF7V https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202212-01 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210902-0003 https://support.apple& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 55EXPL: 1

cyrus-sasl (aka Cyrus SASL) 2.1.27 has an out-of-bounds write leading to unauthenticated remote denial-of-service in OpenLDAP via a malformed LDAP packet. The OpenLDAP crash is ultimately caused by an off-by-one error in _sasl_add_string in common.c in cyrus-sasl. cyrus-sasl (también se conoce como Cyrus SASL) versión 2.1.27, presenta una escritura fuera de límites conllevando a una denegación de servicio remota no autenticada en OpenLDAP por medio de un paquete LDAP malformado. El bloqueo de OpenLDAP es causado en última instancia por un error por un paso en la función _sasl_add_string en el archivo common.c en cyrus-sasl. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Jul/23 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Jul/24 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/02/23/4 https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/issues/587 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00027.h • CWE-193: Off-by-one Error CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 371EXPL: 0

The Bluetooth BR/EDR specification up to and including version 5.1 permits sufficiently low encryption key length and does not prevent an attacker from influencing the key length negotiation. This allows practical brute-force attacks (aka "KNOB") that can decrypt traffic and inject arbitrary ciphertext without the victim noticing. La especificación de Bluetooth BR/EDR incluyendo versión 5.1, permite una longitud de clave de cifrado suficientemente baja y no impide que un atacante influya en la negociación de longitud de clave. Esto permite ataques prácticos de fuerza bruta (también se conoce como "KNOB") que pueden descifrar el tráfico e inyectar texto cifrado arbitrario sin que la víctima se dé cuenta. A flaw was discovered in the Bluetooth protocol. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00036.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00037.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/11 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/13 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/14 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/15 http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/publications/publication12404-abstract.html http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20190828-01-knob-en https: • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3892 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4352 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0727 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •