CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2020-26939
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-26939
In Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC before 1.61 and BC-FJA before 1.0.1.2, attackers can obtain sensitive information about a private exponent because of Observable Differences in Behavior to Error Inputs. This occurs in org.bouncycastle.crypto.encodings.OAEPEncoding. Sending invalid ciphertext that decrypts to a short payload in the OAEP Decoder could result in the throwing of an early exception, potentially leaking some information about the private exponent of the RSA private key performing the encryption. En Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC versiones anteriores a 1.61 y BC-FJA versiones anteriores a 1.0.1.2, los atacantes pueden obtener información confidencial sobre un exponente privado debido a las diferencias observables en el comportamiento de las entradas de error. Esto se presenta en org.bouncycastle.crypto.encodings.OAEPEncoding. • https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE-2020-26939 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8c36ba34e80e05eecb1f80071cc834d705616f315b634ec0c7d8f42e%40%3Cissues.solr.apache.org%3E • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0CVE-2019-17359
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17359
The ASN.1 parser in Bouncy Castle Crypto (aka BC Java) 1.63 can trigger a large attempted memory allocation, and resultant OutOfMemoryError error, via crafted ASN.1 data. This is fixed in 1.64. El analizador ASN.1 en Bouncy Castle Crypto (también se conoce como BC Java) versión 1.63, puede desencadenar un intento de asignación de memoria grande y un error OutOfMemoryError resultante, por medio de datos ASN.1 diseñados. Esto se corrige en la versión 1.64. • https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r02f887807a49cfd1f1ad53f7a61f3f8e12f60ba2c930bec163031209%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r16c3a90cb35ae8a9c74fd5c813c16d6ac255709c9f9d71cd409e007d%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r467ade3fef3493f1fff1a68a256d087874e1f858ad1de7a49fe05d27%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4d475dcaf4f57115fa57d8e06c3823ca398b35468429e7946ebaefdc%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r79b6a6aa0dd1aeb57bd253d94794bc96f1ec005953c4bd5414cc0db0&# • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 47EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1000613
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1000613
Legion of the Bouncy Castle Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography APIs 1.58 up to but not including 1.60 contains a CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in XMSS/XMSS^MT private key deserialization that can result in Deserializing an XMSS/XMSS^MT private key can result in the execution of unexpected code. This attack appear to be exploitable via A handcrafted private key can include references to unexpected classes which will be picked up from the class path for the executing application. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.60 and later. Las API Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography de Legion of the Bouncy Castle en versiones hasta 1.58 pero sin incluir la versión 1.60, contiene una debilidad CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection'), vulnerabilidad en la deserialización de la clave privada XMSS/XMSS^MT que puede resultar en desrealizar una clave privada XMSS/XMSS^MT puede resultar en la ejecución de código inesperado. Este ataque parece ser explotable por medio de una clave privada artesanal que puede incluir referencias a clases inesperadas que se recogerán del class path para la aplicación en ejecución. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00011.html https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/4092ede58da51af9a21e4825fbad0d9a3ef5a223#diff-2c06e2edef41db889ee14899e12bd574 https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/cd98322b171b15b3f88c5ec871175147893c31e6#diff-148a6c098af0199192d6aede960f45dc https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf1bbc0ea4a9f014cf94df9a12a6477d24a27f52741dbc87f2fd52ff2%40%3Cissues.geode.apache.org%3E https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190204-0003 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html https://www.or • CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1000180 – bouncycastle: flaw in the low-level interface to RSA key pair generator
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1000180
Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later. Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 y anteriores tiene un vulnerabilidad en la interfaz de bajo nivel del generador de claves RSA; específicamente, los pares de claves RSA generados en la API de bajo nivel con un valor certainty añadido pueden tener menos tests M-R de lo esperado. Parece que se ha resuelto en versiones BC 1.60 beta 4 y posteriores y BC-FJA 1.0.2 y posteriores. A vulnerability was found in BouncyCastle. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106567 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2423 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2424 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2425 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2428 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2643 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877 https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/22467b6e8fe19717ecdf201c0cf91bacf04a55ad https://github.com/bcgit/ • CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-1000344 – bouncycastle: DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-1000344
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider. En la versión 1.55 y anteriores de Bouncy Castle JCE Provider, la implementación DHIES permitía el uso del modo ECB. Este modo se considera inseguro y el fabricante le ha retirado el soporte. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927 https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/9385b0ebd277724b167fe1d1456e3c112112be1f https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181127-0004 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1000344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588314 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •