CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 252EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0081
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0081
OpenSSL 0.9.6 before 0.9.6d does not properly handle unknown message types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), as demonstrated using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool. OpenSSL 0.9.6 anteriores a la 0.9.6d no manejan adecuadamente los tipos de mensajes desconocidos, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicios (por bucle infinito), como se demuestra utilizando la herramienta de testeo Codenomicon TLS. • ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/OpenServer/SCOSA-2004.10/SCOSA-2004.10.txt ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20040304-01-U.asc http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000834 http://fedoranews.org/updates/FEDORA-2004-095.shtml http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=107955049331965&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=108403850228012&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-119.html http://secunia.com/advisories/11139 http://security.gen •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 245EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0112
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0112
The SSL/TLS handshaking code in OpenSSL 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b, and 0.9.7c, when using Kerberos ciphersuites, does not properly check the length of Kerberos tickets during a handshake, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that causes an out-of-bounds read. El código que une SSL/TLS en OpenSSL 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b y 0.9.7c, usando Kerberos, no comprueba adecuadamente la longitud de los tickets de Kerberos, lo que permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio. • ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2004-005.txt.asc ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/OpenServer/SCOSA-2004.10/SCOSA-2004.10.txt http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000834 http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=61798 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2005//Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2005/Aug/msg00000.html http://lists.apple.com/mhonarc/security-announce/msg00045.html http: • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 252EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0079
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0079
The do_change_cipher_spec function in OpenSSL 0.9.6c to 0.9.6k, and 0.9.7a to 0.9.7c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that triggers a null dereference. La función do_change_cipher_spec en OpenSSL 0.9.6c hasta 0.9.6.k y 0.9.7a hasta 0.9.7c permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (caída) mediante una hábil unión SSL/TLS que provoca un puntero nulo. • ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-04:05.openssl.asc ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2004-005.txt.asc ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/OpenServer/SCOSA-2004.10/SCOSA-2004.10.txt http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000834 http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=61798 http://fedoranews.org/updates/FEDORA-2004-095.shtml http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2005//Aug/msg00001.html http&# • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2003-1003
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2003-1003
Cisco PIX firewall 5.x.x, and 6.3.1 and earlier, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) via an SNMPv3 message when snmp-server is set. Cisco PIX Firewall 5.x.x y 6.3.1 y anteriores, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída y recarga) mediante un mensaje SNMPv3 cuando está activado snmp-server. • http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20031215-pix.shtml • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 4%CPEs: 8EXPL: 2CVE-2000-1022 – Cisco PIX Firewall 4.x/5.x - SMTP Content Filtering Evasion
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2000-1022
The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/20231 http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277 •