CVSS: 6.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 22EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16878 – pacemaker: Insufficient verification inflicted preference of uncontrolled processes can lead to DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16878
A flaw was found in pacemaker up to and including version 2.0.1. An insufficient verification inflicted preference of uncontrolled processes can lead to DoS Se encontró un fallo en el software Pacemaker hasta la versión 2.0.1 inclusive. Una verificación insuficiente de los procesos preferentes no controlados puede llevar a una condición de denegación de servicios (DoS). A flaw was found in pacemaker. An insufficient verification inflicted preference of uncontrolled processes can lead to DoS. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00034.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108039 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1278 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1279 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16878 https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/pull/1749 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/01/msg00007.html https://lists.fedoraprojec • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2016-7035 – pacemaker: Privilege escalation due to improper guarding of IPC communication
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7035
An authorization flaw was found in Pacemaker before 1.1.16, where it did not properly guard its IPC interface. An attacker with an unprivileged account on a Pacemaker node could use this flaw to, for example, force the Local Resource Manager daemon to execute a script as root and thereby gain root access on the machine. Se ha detectado un error en Pacemaker en versiones anteriores a la 1.1.6 por el que no protegía correctamente su interfaz IPC. Un atacante con una cuenta sin privilegios en un nodo Pacemaker podría emplear este error para, por ejemplo, forzar al demonio Local Resource Manager para que ejecute un script como root y, por lo tanto, obtenga acceso root a la máquina An authorization flaw was found in Pacemaker, where it did not properly guard its IPC interface. An attacker with an unprivileged account on a Pacemaker node could use this flaw to, for example, force the Local Resource Manager daemon to execute a script as root and thereby gain root access on the machine. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2614.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2675.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/5 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94214 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7035 https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/5d71e65049 https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-November/004432.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-08 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016- • CWE-285: Improper Authorization •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 2%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2016-7797 – pacemaker: pacemaker remote nodes vulnerable to hijacking, resulting in a DoS attack
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7797
Pacemaker before 1.1.15, when using pacemaker remote, might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (node disconnection) via an unauthenticated connection. Pacemaker en versiones anteriores a 1.1.15, al usar el control remoto de marcapasos, podría permitir a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (desconexión de nodo) a través de una conexión no autenticada. It was found that the connection between a pacemaker cluster and a pacemaker_remote node could be shut down using a new unauthenticated connection. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of service. • http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5269 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-11/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-12/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00077.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2578.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/01/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93261 https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/5ec24a2642bd0854b884d1a9b51d12371373b410 htt • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1867 – pacemaker: acl read-only access allow role assignment
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1867
Pacemaker before 1.1.13 does not properly evaluate added nodes, which allows remote read-only users to gain privileges via an acl command. Vulnerabilidad en Pacemaker en versiones anteriores a 1.1.13, no evalúa correctamente nodos añadidos, lo que permite a usuarios remotos de sólo lectura obtener privilegios a través de un comando de acl. A flaw was found in the way pacemaker, a cluster resource manager, evaluated added nodes in certain situations. A user with read-only access could potentially assign any other existing roles to themselves and then add privileges to other users as well. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/170610.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/169671.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/169995.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1424.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2383.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74231 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211370 https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/84ac07c https: • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •