Page 2 of 78 results (0.008 seconds)

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

On versions beginning in 7.1.5 to before 7.2.3.1, a DLL hijacking vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows. User interaction and administrative privileges are required to exploit this vulnerability because the victim user needs to run the executable on the system and the attacker requires administrative privileges for modifying the files in the trusted search path. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. • https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K07143733 • CWE-427: Uncontrolled Search Path Element •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 45EXPL: 2

The HTTPS protocol, as used in unspecified web applications, can encrypt compressed data without properly obfuscating the length of the unencrypted data, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain plaintext secret values by observing length differences during a series of guesses in which a string in an HTTP request URL potentially matches an unknown string in an HTTP response body, aka a "BREACH" attack, a different issue than CVE-2012-4929. El protocolo HTTPS, como es usado en aplicaciones web no especificadas, puede cifrar datos comprimidos sin ofuscar apropiadamente la longitud de los datos no cifrados, facilitando a atacantes de tipo "man-in-the-middle" obtener valores secretos en texto plano al observar las diferencias de longitud durante una serie de adivinaciones en las que una cadena en una URL de peticiones HTTP coincide potencialmente con una cadena desconocida en un cuerpo de respuesta HTTP, también se conoce como ataque "BREACH", un problema diferente de CVE-2012-4929. • http://breachattack.com http://github.com/meldium/breach-mitigation-rails http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/20406/is-http-compression-safe#20407 http://slashdot.org/story/13/08/05/233216 http://www.iacr.org/cryptodb/archive/2002/FSE/3091/3091.pdf http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/987798 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995168 https://hackerone.com/reports/254895 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7f0e9cfd166934172d43ca4c272b8bdda4a343036229d9937affd1e1%40%3Cdev.httpd.apach • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 77EXPL: 0

An Information Disclosure vulnerability exists in NTP 4.2.7p25 private (mode 6/7) messages via a GET_RESTRICT control message, which could let a malicious user obtain sensitive information. Existe una vulnerabilidad de Divulgación de Información en los mensajes privados (modo 6/7) de NTP versión 4.2.7p25 por medio de un mensaje de control GET_RESTRICT, que podría permitir a un usuario malicioso obtener información confidencial. • https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/95841 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K44942017 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K44942017?utm_source=f5support&amp%3Butm_medium=RSS • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0

On BIG-IP 11.5.1-11.6.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3, 13.0.0-13.1.1.1, and 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, under certain conditions, the snmpd daemon may leak memory on a multi-blade BIG-IP vCMP guest when processing authorized SNMP requests. En BIG-IP, 11.5.1-11.6.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3, 13.0.0-13.1.1.1 y 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, bajo ciertas circunstancias, el demonio snmpd podría divulgar memoria en un invitado BIG-IP vCMP con varios blades al procesar peticiones SNMP autorizadas. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K12139752 • CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 65EXPL: 0

On BIG-IP 11.5.1-11.5.8, 11.6.1-11.6.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3.6, 13.0.0-13.1.1.1, and 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, under certain conditions, hardware systems with a High-Speed Bridge and using non-default Layer 2 forwarding configurations may experience a lockup of the High-Speed Bridge. En BIG-IP, en versiones 11.5.1-11.5.8, 11.6.1-11.6.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3.6, 13.0.0-13.1.1.1 y 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, en determinadas circunstancias, los sistemas de hardware con un puente de velocidad alta que utilizan configuraciones de reenvío de la capa 2 no establecidas por defecto podrían experimentar el bloqueo de dicho puente. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K26455071 •