CVE-2019-13456 – freeradius: eap-pwd: Information leak due to aborting when needing more than 10 iterations
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13456
In FreeRADIUS 3.0 through 3.0.19, on average 1 in every 2048 EAP-pwd handshakes fails because the password element cannot be found within 10 iterations of the hunting and pecking loop. This leaks information that an attacker can use to recover the password of any user. This information leakage is similar to the "Dragonblood" attack and CVE-2019-9494. En FreeRADIUS versiones 3.0 hasta 3.0.19, en promedio 1 de cada 2048 protocolos de enlace EAP-pwd presenta un fallo porque el elemento de contraseña no puede ser encontrado dentro de las 10 iteraciones del bucle de tipo "hunting and pecking". Esto filtra información que un atacante puede utilizar para recuperar la contraseña de cualquier usuario. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-04/msg00039.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737663 https://freeradius.org/security https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/freeradius-server/commit/3ea2a5a026e73d81cd9a3e9bbd4300c433004bfa https://wpa3.mathyvanhoef.com https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-13456 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVE-2019-10143 – freeradius: privilege escalation due to insecure logrotate configuration
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10143
It was discovered freeradius up to and including version 3.0.19 does not correctly configure logrotate, allowing a local attacker who already has control of the radiusd user to escalate his privileges to root, by tricking logrotate into writing a radiusd-writable file to a directory normally inaccessible by the radiusd user. NOTE: the upstream software maintainer has stated "there is simply no way for anyone to gain privileges through this alleged issue." ** EN DISPUTA **Se encontró que freeradius hasta la versión 3.0.19 incluyéndola, no configura correctamente el componente logrotate, lo que permite que un atacante local que ya tiene el control del usuario radiusd escale sus privilegios a root, engañando a logrotate para que escriba un archivo escribible en radiusd en un directorio normalmente inaccesible para el usuario radiusd. NOTA: el mantenedor de software upstream ha declarado que "simplemente no hay forma de que alguien obtenga privilegios a través de este supuesto problema" It was discovered freeradius does not correctly configure logrotate, allowing a local attacker who already has control of the radiusd user to escalate his privileges to root, by tricking logrotate into writing a radiusd-writable file to a directory normally inaccessible by the radiusd user. FreeRadius versions 3.0.19 and below suffer from a privilege escalation vulnerability via insecure logrotate use. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155361/FreeRadius-3.0.19-Logrotate-Privilege-Escalation.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Nov/14 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3353 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10143 https://freeradius.org/security https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/freeradius-server/pull/2666 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/A6VKBZAZKJP5QKXDXRKCM2ZPZND3TFAX https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ • CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •
CVE-2019-11235 – freeradius: eap-pwd: authentication bypass via an invalid curve attack
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11235
FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 mishandles the "each participant verifies that the received scalar is within a range, and that the received group element is a valid point on the curve being used" protection mechanism, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9498 and CVE-2019-9499. FreeRADIUS versión anterior a 3.0.19 no maneja correctamente el mecanismo de protección "cada participante verifica que el escalar recibido está dentro de un rango, y que el elemento de grupo recibido es un punto válido en la curva que se está utilizando", alias "Dragonblood", este problema es similar a CVE-2019-9498 y CVE-2019-9499. A vulnerability was found in FreeRadius. An invalid curve attack allows an attacker to authenticate as any user, without knowing the password. FreeRADIUS doesn't verify whether the received elliptic curve point is valid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-04/msg00033.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1131 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1142 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695748 https://freeradius.org/release_notes/?br=3.0.x&re=3.0.19 https://freeradius.org/security https://papers.math • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •
CVE-2019-11234 – freeradius: eap-pwd: fake authentication using reflection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11234
FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 does not prevent use of reflection for authentication spoofing, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9497. FreeRADIUS antes de 3.0.19 no impide el uso de la reflexión para la autenticación de spoofing, también conocido como "Dragonblood", un problema similar al CVE-2019-9497. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-04/msg00033.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1131 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1142 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695783 https://freeradius.org/release_notes/?br=3.0.x&re=3.0.19 https://freeradius.org/security https://papers.math • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVE-2017-10983 – freeradius: Out-of-bounds read in fr_dhcp_decode() when decoding option 63
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-10983
An FR-GV-206 issue in FreeRADIUS 2.x before 2.2.10 and 3.x before 3.0.15 allows "DHCP - Read overflow when decoding option 63" and a denial of service. Un problema FR-GV-206 en FreeRADIUS versión 2.x anterior a 2.2.10 y versión 3.x anterior a 3.0.15, permite una "DHCP - Read overflow when decoding option 63" y una denegación de servicio. An out-of-bounds read flaw was found in the way FreeRADIUS server handled decoding of DHCP packets. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash the FreeRADIUS server by sending a specially crafted DHCP request. • http://freeradius.org/security/fuzzer-2017.html http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3930 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99915 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038914 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1759 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2389 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-10983 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468503 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •