CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2023-0056 – haproxy: segfault DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-0056
An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability was discovered in HAProxy which could crash the service. This issue could allow an authenticated remote attacker to run a specially crafted malicious server in an OpenShift cluster. The biggest impact is to availability. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-0056 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160808 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 19%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2022-0711 – haproxy: Denial of service via set-cookie2 header
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-0711
A flaw was found in the way HAProxy processed HTTP responses containing the "Set-Cookie2" header. This flaw could allow an attacker to send crafted HTTP response packets which lead to an infinite loop, eventually resulting in a denial of service condition. The highest threat from this vulnerability is availability. Se ha encontrado un fallo en la forma en que HAProxy procesa las respuestas HTTP que contienen el encabezado "Set-Cookie2". Este fallo podría permitir a un atacante enviar paquetes de respuesta HTTP diseñados que conllevaran a un bucle infinito, resultando eventualmente en una situación de denegación de servicio. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2022-0711 https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/bfb15ab34ead85f64cd6da0e9fb418c9cd14cee8 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5102 https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy%40formilux.org/msg41833.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-0711 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053666 • CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 14EXPL: 5CVE-2021-40346 – haproxy: request smuggling attack or response splitting via duplicate content-length header
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-40346
An integer overflow exists in HAProxy 2.0 through 2.5 in htx_add_header that can be exploited to perform an HTTP request smuggling attack, allowing an attacker to bypass all configured http-request HAProxy ACLs and possibly other ACLs. Se presenta un desbordamiento de enteros en HAProxy versiones 2.0 a 2.5, en la función htx_add_header() que puede ser explotada para llevar a cabo un ataque de contrabando de peticiones HTTP, permitiendo a un atacante omitir todas las ACLs configuradas de HAProxy de peticiones http y posiblemente otras ACLs Proxy server haproxy has a flaw that can could allow an HTTP request smuggling attack with the goal of bypassing access-control list rules defined by haproxy. The attack was made possible by utilizing an integer overflow vulnerability that allowed reaching an unexpected state in haproxy while parsing an HTTP request. The highest threat from this vulnerability is integrity. • https://github.com/knqyf263/CVE-2021-40346 https://github.com/donky16/CVE-2021-40346-POC https://github.com/alikarimi999/CVE-2021-40346 https://github.com/alexOarga/CVE-2021-40346 https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/3b69886f7dcc3cfb3d166309018e6cfec9ce2c95 https://jfrog.com/blog/critical-vulnerability-in-haproxy-cve-2021-40346-integer-overflow-enables-http-smuggling https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r284567dd7523f5823e2ce995f787ccd37b1cc4108779c50a97c79120%40%3Cdev.cloudstac • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2021-39240 – haproxy: does not ensure that the scheme and path portions of a URI have the expected characters
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-39240
An issue was discovered in HAProxy 2.2 before 2.2.16, 2.3 before 2.3.13, and 2.4 before 2.4.3. It does not ensure that the scheme and path portions of a URI have the expected characters. For example, the authority field (as observed on a target HTTP/2 server) might differ from what the routing rules were intended to achieve. Se ha detectado un problema en HAProxy versiones 2.2 anteriores a 2.2.16, versiones 2.3 anteriores a 2.3.13 y versiones 2.4 anteriores a 2.4.3. No se asegura que las porciones de esquema y ruta de un URI tengan los caracteres esperados. • https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4b8852c70d8c4b7e225e24eb58258a15eb54c26e https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=a495e0d94876c9d39763db319f609351907a31e8 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4ALECUZDIMT5FYGP6V6PVSI4BKVZTZWN https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RPNY4WZIQUAUOCLIMUPC37AQWNXTWIQM https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4960 https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy%40formilux.org/msg41041 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2021-39241 – haproxy: an HTTP method name may contain a space followed by the name of a protected resource
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-39241
An issue was discovered in HAProxy 2.0 before 2.0.24, 2.2 before 2.2.16, 2.3 before 2.3.13, and 2.4 before 2.4.3. An HTTP method name may contain a space followed by the name of a protected resource. It is possible that a server would interpret this as a request for that protected resource, such as in the "GET /admin? HTTP/1.1 /static/images HTTP/1.1" example. Se ha detectado un problema en HAProxy versiones 2.0 anteriores a 2.0.24, versiones 2.2 anteriores a 2.2.16, versiones 2.3 anteriores a 2.3.13 y versiones 2.4 anteriores a 2.4.3. • https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=89265224d314a056d77d974284802c1b8a0dc97f https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4ALECUZDIMT5FYGP6V6PVSI4BKVZTZWN https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RPNY4WZIQUAUOCLIMUPC37AQWNXTWIQM https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4960 https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy%40formilux.org/msg41041.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-39241 https://bugzilla.redha • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •