CVSS: 2.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5006 – JDK: local disclosure of kerberos credentials cache
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5006
IBM Java Security Components in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 before SR2, 7 R1 before SR3 FP20, 7 before SR9 FP20, 6 R1 before SR8 FP15, and 6 before SR16 FP15 allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading the Kerberos Credential Cache. IBM Java Security Components en IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 en versiones anteriores a SR2, 7 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR3 FP20, 7 en versiones anteriores a SR9 FP20, 6 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR8 FP15 y 6 en versiones anteriores a SR16 FP15 permite a atacantes físicamente próximos obtener información sensible mediante la lectura del Kerberos Credential Cache. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00000.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-01 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1931 – JDK: plain text data stored in memory dumps
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1931
IBM Java Security Components in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 before SR1 FP10, 7 R1 before SR3 FP10, 7 before SR9 FP10, 6 R1 before SR8 FP7, 6 before SR16 FP7, and 5.0 before SR16 FP13 stores plaintext information in memory dumps, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a file. IBM Java Security Components en IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 versiones anteriores a SR1 FP10, 7 R1 anteriores a SR3 FP10, 7 anteriores a SR9 FP10, 6 R1 anteriores a SR8 FP7, 6 anteriores a SR16 FP7, y 5.0 anteriores a SR16 FP13, almacena información de texto plano en volcados de memoria, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener información confidencial al leer un archivo • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00051.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-09/msg00014.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1485.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1486.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1488.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1544.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1604.html http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IV75182 http://www-01.ibm&# • CWE-312: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4000 – LOGJAM: TLS connections which support export grade DHE key-exchange are vulnerable to MITM attacks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2015-0192 – JDK: unspecified Java sandbox restrictions bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0192
Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1, 7 R1 before SR2 FP11, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en IBM Java 8 anterior a SR1, 7 R1 anterior a SR2 FP11, 7 anterior a SR9, 6 R1 anterior a SR8 FP4, 6 anterior a SR16 FP4, y 5.0 anterior a SR16 FP10 permite a atacantes remotos ganar privilegios a través de vectores desconocidos relacionados con Java Virtual Machine. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00031.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1006.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1007.html http://rhn.redhat.com&#x •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 160EXPL: 0CVE-2015-2808 – SSL/TLS: "Invariance Weakness" vulnerability in RC4 stream cipher
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-2808
The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. El algoritmo RC4, utilizado en el protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL, no combina correctamente los datos de estados con los datos de claves durante la fase de inicialización, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de recuperación de texto claro contra los bytes iniciales de un flujo mediante la captura de trafico de la red que ocasionalmente depende de claves afectadas por la debilidad de la invariabilidad (Invariance Weakness), y posteriormente utilizar un acercamiento de fuerza bruta que involucra valores LSB, también conocido como el problema de 'Bar Mitzvah'. • http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04779034 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •