CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 50EXPL: 1CVE-2020-24586 – kernel: Fragmentation cache not cleared on reconnection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-24586
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that received fragments be cleared from memory after (re)connecting to a network. Under the right circumstances, when another device sends fragmented frames encrypted using WEP, CCMP, or GCMP, this can be abused to inject arbitrary network packets and/or exfiltrate user data. El estándar 802.11 que sustenta a Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, y WPA3) y Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) no requiere que los fragmentos recibidos se borren de la memoria después de (re)conectarse a una red. En las circunstancias adecuadas, cuando otro dispositivo envía tramas fragmentadas cifradas mediante WEP, CCMP o GCMP, se puede abusar de esto para inyectar paquetes de red arbitrarios y/o exfiltrar datos del usuario A flaw was found in the Linux kernels implementation of wifi fragmentation handling. An attacker with the ability to transmit within the wireless transmission range of an access point can abuse a flaw where previous contents of wifi fragments can be unintentionally transmitted to another device. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/11/12 https://github.com/vanhoefm/fragattacks/blob/master/SUMMARY.md https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00019.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00020.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00002.html https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-wifi-faf-22epcEWu https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/12 • CWE-212: Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 385EXPL: 1CVE-2020-24588 – kernel: wifi frame payload being parsed incorrectly as an L2 frame
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-24588
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802.11n), an adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets. El estándar 802.11 que sustenta a Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, y WPA3) y Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) no requiere que el flag A-MSDU en el campo de encabezado QoS de texto plano esté autenticada. Contra dispositivos que admiten la recepción de tramas A-MSDU que no son SSP (que es obligatorio como parte de 802.11n), un adversario puede abusar de esto para inyectar paquetes de red arbitrarios A flaw was found in the Linux kernels wifi implementation. An attacker within wireless broadcast range can inject custom data into the wireless communication circumventing checks on the data. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/11/12 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-913875.pdf https://github.com/vanhoefm/fragattacks/blob/master/SUMMARY.md https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00019.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00020.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00002.html https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-wifi-faf-22epcEWu https: • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 3.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 338EXPL: 1CVE-2020-24587 – kernel: Reassembling fragments encrypted under different keys
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-24587
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that all fragments of a frame are encrypted under the same key. An adversary can abuse this to decrypt selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP encryption key is periodically renewed. El estándar 802.11 que sustenta a Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, y WPA3) y Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) no requiere que todos los fragmentos de una trama estén cifrados con la misma clave. Un adversario puede abusar de esto para descifrar fragmentos seleccionados cuando otro dispositivo envía tramas fragmentadas y la clave de cifrado WEP, CCMP o GCMP es periódicamente renovada A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's WiFi implementation. An attacker within the wireless range can abuse a logic flaw in the WiFi implementation by reassembling packets from multiple fragments under different keys, treating them as valid. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/11/12 https://github.com/vanhoefm/fragattacks/blob/master/SUMMARY.md https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00019.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00020.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00002.html https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-wifi-faf-22epcEWu https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/12 • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •
CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2004-1038
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-1038
A design error in the IEEE1394 specification allows attackers with physical access to a device to read and write to sensitive memory using a modified FireWire/IEEE 1394 client, thus bypassing intended restrictions that would normally require greater degrees of physical access to exploit. NOTE: this was reported in 2008 to affect Windows Vista, but some Linux-based operating systems have protection mechanisms against this attack. • http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/04/1258210 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109881362530790&w=2 http://md.hudora.de/presentations/firewire/2005-firewire-cansecwest.pdf http://pacsec.jp/advisories.html http://storm.net.nz/projects/16 http://storm.net.nz/static/files/ab_firewire_rux2k6-final.pdf http://www.sec-consult.com/fileadmin/Whitepapers/Vista_Physical_Attacks.pdf http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489163/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/arch •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 9%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0459
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0459
The Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) algorithm in the IEEE 802.11 wireless protocol, when using DSSS transmission encoding, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a certain RF signal that causes a channel to appear busy (aka "jabber"), which prevents devices from transmitting data. El algoritmo de identificicación de canal vacio (Clear Channel Assessment - CCA) en el protocolo inalámbrico IEEE 802.11, cuando usa codificación de trasmisión de codificación DSSS, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio mediante ciertas señales de RF que causan que el canel aparezca ocupado ("jabber"), lo que impida que los dispositivos reciban datos. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-05/0631.html http://securitytracker.com/id?1010152 http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2004-009.pdf http://www.auscert.org.au/render.html?it=4091 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/106678 http://www.osvdb.org/16034 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10342 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16138 •