CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2014-8764
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8764
DokuWiki 2014-05-05a and earlier, when using Active Directory for LDAP authentication, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a user name and password starting with a null (\0) character, which triggers an anonymous bind. DokuWiki 2014-05-05a y anteriores, cuando utiliza Active Directory para la autenticación LDAP, permite a atacantes remotos evadir la autenticación a través de un nombre de usuario y una contraseña que empiece por un caracter nulo (\0), lo que provoca un bind anónimo. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0438.html http://secunia.com/advisories/61983 http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3059 http://www.freelists.org/post/dokuwiki/Fwd-Dokuwiki-maybe-security-issue-Null-byte-poisoning-in-LDAP-authentication http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/10/13/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/10/16/9 https://github.com/splitbrain/dokuwiki/pull/868 • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 147EXPL: 1CVE-2014-3566 – SSL/TLS: Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption attack
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3566
The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue. El protocolo SSL 3.0, utilizado en OpenSSL hasta 1.0.1i y otros productos, utiliza relleno (padding) CBC no determinístico, lo que facilita a los atacantes man-in-the-middle obtener datos de texto plano a través de un ataque de relleno (padding) oracle, también conocido como el problema "POODLE". A flaw was found in the way SSL 3.0 handled padding bytes when decrypting messages encrypted using block ciphers in cipher block chaining (CBC) mode. This flaw allows a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacker to decrypt a selected byte of a cipher text in as few as 256 tries if they are able to force a victim application to repeatedly send the same data over newly created SSL 3.0 connections. • https://github.com/mikesplain/CVE-2014-3566-poodle-cookbook ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-015.txt.asc http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0416.html http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory11.asc http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0101.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0103.html http://askubuntu.com/questions/537196/how-do-i-patch-workaround-sslv3-poodle-vulnerability-cve-2014-3566 http& • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1CVE-2014-7204
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7204
jscript.c in Exuberant Ctags 5.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU and disk consumption) via a crafted JavaScript file. jscript.c en Exuberant Ctags 5.8 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (bucle infinito y consumo de CPU y disco) a través de un fichero JavaScript manipulado. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0415.html http://sourceforge.net/p/ctags/code/791 http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3042 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:178 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/09/29/40 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2371-1 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742605 • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 87%CPEs: 345EXPL: 17CVE-2014-7169 – GNU Bourne-Again Shell (Bash) Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7169
GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271. GNU Bash hasta 4.3 bash43-025 procesa cadenas finales después de la definición malformada de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos escribir hacia ficheros o posiblemente tener otro impacto desconocido a través de un entorno manipulado, tal y como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en la cual establecer el entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash. Nota: Esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2014-6271. It was found that the fix for CVE-2014-6271 was incomplete, and Bash still allowed certain characters to be injected into other environments via specially crafted environment variables. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34766 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/35115 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36933 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34765 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34860 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34879 • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-228: Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 345EXPL: 54CVE-2014-6271 – GNU Bourne-Again Shell (Bash) Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-6271
GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix. GNU Bash hasta la versión 4.3 procesa cadenas finales después de las definiciones de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un entorno manipulado, tal como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en las cuales el ajuste de entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash, también conocido como "ShellShock." NOTA: la reparación original para este problema era incorrecta; CVE-2014-7169 ha sido asignada para cubrir la vulnerabilidad que todavía está presente después de la solución incorrecta. A flaw was found in the way Bash evaluated certain specially crafted environment variables. • https://github.com/darrenmartyn/visualdoor https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38849 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39918 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40619 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40938 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34900 https • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •