Page 2 of 20 results (0.027 seconds)

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 2

jquery prior to 1.9.0 allows Cross-site Scripting attacks via the load method. The load method fails to recognize and remove "<script>" HTML tags that contain a whitespace character, i.e: "</script >", which results in the enclosed script logic to be executed. jquery versiones anteriores a 1.9.0, permite ataques de tipo Cross-site Scripting por medio del método de carga. El método de carga presenta un fallo al reconocer y eliminar las etiquetas HTML "(script)" que contienen un carácter de espacio en blanco, es decir: "(/script )", lo cual resulta en que la lógica de script adjunta sea ejecutada. A flaw was found in jquery in versions prior to 1.9.0. A cross-site scripting attack is possible as the load method fails to recognize and remove "<script>" HTML tags that contain a whitespace character which results in the enclosed script logic to be executed. • https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2020-7656 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200528-0001 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-JQUERY-569619 https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2021-07-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-Multiple-J-Web-vulnerabilities-resolved-in-Junos-OS-21-2R1?language=en_US https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-7656 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850119 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 2%CPEs: 81EXPL: 5

In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. En jQuery versiones mayores o iguales a 1.0.3 y anteriores a la versión 3.5.0, passing HTML contiene elementos de fuentes no seguras – incluso después de sanearlo – para uno de los métodos de manipulación de jQuery ´s DOM ( i.e. html t(), adjunto (), y otros ) podrían ejecutar códigos no seguros. Este problema está corregido en JQuery 3.5.0. A flaw was found in jQuery. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49767 https://github.com/0xAJ2K/CVE-2020-11022-CVE-2020-11023 https://github.com/Cybernegro/CVE-2020-11023 https://github.com/Snorlyd/https-nj.gov---CVE-2020-11023 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00067.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00085.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-11/msg00039.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/162160/jQuery-1.0.3-Cross& • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 6%CPEs: 206EXPL: 5

In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.2 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. En las versiones de jQuery mayores o iguales a 1.2 y anteriores a la versión 3.5.0, se puede ejecutar HTML desde fuentes no seguras, incluso después de desinfectarlo, a uno de los métodos de manipulación DOM de jQuery (es decir .html (), .append () y otros). código no seguro Este problema está corregido en jQuery 3.5.0. A Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in JQuery. This flaw allows an attacker with the ability to supply input to the ‘HTML’ function to inject Javascript into the page where that input is rendered, and have it delivered by the browser. jQuery version 1.2 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49766 https://github.com/0xAJ2K/CVE-2020-11022-CVE-2020-11023 https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2020-11022 https://github.com/Snorlyd/https-nj.gov---CVE-2020-11022 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00067.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00085.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-11/msg00039.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/162159/jQuery-1.2& • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 38EXPL: 18

When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that may be surprising. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99, Tomcat shipped with an AJP Connector enabled by default that listened on all configured IP addresses. It was expected (and recommended in the security guide) that this Connector would be disabled if not required. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49039 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48143 https://github.com/sgdream/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/xindongzhuaizhuai/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/laolisafe/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/sv3nbeast/CVE-2020-1938-Tomact-file_include-file_read https://github.com/fairyming/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/dacade/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/Hancheng-Lei/Hacking-Vulnerability-CVE-2020-1938-Ghostcat https://github.com/w4fz5uck5& • CWE-285: Improper Authorization •

CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 0

In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99 the HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. En Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.0 hasta 7.0.99, el código de análisis del encabezado HTTP utilizó un enfoque para el análisis de fin de línea que permitió a algunos encabezados HTTP no válidos ser analizados como válidos. Esto conllevó a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido en una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r127f76181aceffea2bd4711b03c595d0f115f63e020348fe925a916c%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r441c1f30a252bf14b07396286f6abd8089ce4240e91323211f1a2d75%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r660cd379afe346f10d72c0eaa8459ccc95d83aff181671b7e9076919%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •