CVSS: 3.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 33EXPL: 0CVE-2022-21619 – OpenJDK: improper handling of long NTLM client hostnames (Security, 8286526)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-21619
Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Security). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u341, 8u345-perf, 11.0.16.1, 17.0.4.1, 19; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.7, 21.3.3 and 22.2.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. • https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/37QDWJBGEPP65X43NXQTXQ7KASLUHON6 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3ARF4QF4N3X5GSFHXUBWARGLISGKJ33R https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3QLQ7OD33W6LT3HWI7VYDFFJLV75Y73K https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EXSBV3W6EP6B7XJ63Z2FPVBH6HAPGJ5T https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40li • CWE-192: Integer Coercion Error •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 33EXPL: 0CVE-2022-21628 – OpenJDK: HttpServer no connection count limit (Lightweight HTTP Server, 8286918)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-21628
Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Lightweight HTTP Server). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u341, 8u345-perf, 11.0.16.1, 17.0.4.1, 19; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.7, 21.3.3 and 22.2.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. • https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/37QDWJBGEPP65X43NXQTXQ7KASLUHON6 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3ARF4QF4N3X5GSFHXUBWARGLISGKJ33R https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3QLQ7OD33W6LT3HWI7VYDFFJLV75Y73K https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EXSBV3W6EP6B7XJ63Z2FPVBH6HAPGJ5T https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40li • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2022-1434 – Incorrect MAC key used in the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1434
The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7d56a74a96828985db7354a55227a511615f732b https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 10%CPEs: 59EXPL: 5CVE-2022-1292 – The c_rehash script allows command injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1292
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). • https://github.com/alcaparra/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/li8u99/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/greek0x0/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/rama291041610/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/und3sc0n0c1d0/CVE-2022-1292 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1ad73b4d27bd8c1b369a3cd453681d3a4f1bb9b2 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=548d3f280a6e737673f5b61fce24bb100108dfeb https://git • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2022-1343 – OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1343
The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1343 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087911 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •