Page 2 of 111 results (0.015 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 2

OpenBSD kernel version <= 6.5 can be forced to create long chains of TCP SACK holes that causes very expensive calls to tcp_sack_option() for every incoming SACK packet which can lead to a denial of service. La versión del núcleo de OpenBSD anterior o igual a la versión 6.5 se puede forzar a crear largas cadenas de agujeros TCP SACK que provocan llamadas muy costosas a tcp_sack_option () para cada paquete SACK entrante que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/6.5/common/006_tcpsack.patch.sig https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/ed8fdce754a5d8d14c09e989d8877707bd43906f https://research.checkpoint.com/tcp-sack-security-issue-in-openbsd-cve-2019-8460 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190905-0001 https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-19-253-03 • CWE-1049: Excessive Data Query Operations in a Large Data Table •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

A flaw exists in OpenBSD's implementation of the stack guard page that allows attackers to bypass it resulting in arbitrary code execution using setuid binaries such as /usr/bin/at. This affects OpenBSD 6.1 and possibly earlier versions. Existe un error en la implementación de OpenBSD de la página stack guard que permite que los atacantes la omitan, lo que resulta en la ejecución de código arbitrario mediante el uso de binarios setuid como /usr/bin/at. Esto afecta a OpenBSD 6.1 y posiblemente a versiones anteriores. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99172 https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/6.1/common/008_exec_subr.patch.sig https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The OpenBSD qsort() function is recursive, and not randomized, an attacker can construct a pathological input array of N elements that causes qsort() to deterministically recurse N/4 times. This allows attackers to consume arbitrary amounts of stack memory and manipulate stack memory to assist in arbitrary code execution attacks. This affects OpenBSD 6.1 and possibly earlier versions. La función qsort() de OpenBSD es recursiva y no aleatorizada, por lo que un atacante puede construir un array de entrada patológica de elementos N que provoca que qsort() se repita inevitablemente N/4 veces. Esto permite que los atacantes consuman cantidades de memoria de pila arbitrarias y manipulen la memoria de pila para ayudar en los ataques de ejecución de código arbitrario. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42271 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99177 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039427 https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libc/stdlib/qsort.c?rev=1.15&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup https://support.apple.com/HT208112 https://support.apple.com/HT208113 https://support.apple.com/HT208115 https://support.apple.com/HT208144 https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0

The LZW decompressor in (1) the BufCompressedFill function in fontfile/decompress.c in X.Org libXfont before 1.4.4 and (2) compress/compress.c in 4.3BSD, as used in zopen.c in OpenBSD before 3.8, FreeBSD, NetBSD 4.0.x and 5.0.x before 5.0.3 and 5.1.x before 5.1.1, FreeType 2.1.9, and other products, does not properly handle code words that are absent from the decompression table when encountered, which allows context-dependent attackers to trigger an infinite loop or a heap-based buffer overflow, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via a crafted compressed stream, a related issue to CVE-2006-1168 and CVE-2011-2896. El descompresor en LZW en (1) la función BufCompressedFill en fontfile/decompress.c en X.Org libXfont antes de la versión v1.4.4 y (2) compress/compress.c en 4.3BSD, tal y como se utiliza en zopen.c en OpenBSD antes de la versión v3.8, FreeBSD, NetBSD, FreeType v2.1.9, y otros productos, no controla correctamente las palabras de código ausentes de la tabla de descompresión, lo que permite provocar un bucle infinito o un desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica (heap) a atacantes (dependiendo del contexto) y posiblemente ejecutar código de su elección a través de un flujo comprimido debidamente modificado. Se trata de un problema relacionado con los CVE-2006-1168 y CVE-2011 2896. • http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXfont/commit/?id=d11ee5886e9d9ec610051a206b135a4cdc1e09a0 http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2011-007.txt.asc http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2012/Feb/msg00000.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2012/May/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Dec/msg00000.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Dec/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/secur • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0

Multiple integer overflows in the glob implementation in libc in OpenBSD before 4.9 might allow context-dependent attackers to have an unspecified impact via a crafted string, related to the GLOB_APPEND and GLOB_DOOFFS flags, a different issue than CVE-2011-0418. Múltiples desbordamientos de entero en la implementación de glob en libc en OpenBSD anterior a v4.9 podría permitir a atacantes dependientes de contexto tener un impacto no especificado a través de una cadena manipulada, relacionado con el GLOB_APPEND y banderas GLOB_DOOFFS, una fallo diferente de CVE-2011-0418. • http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/97 http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libc/gen/glob.c#rev1.35 http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libc/gen/glob.c.diff?r1=1.34%3Br2=1.35%3Bf=h http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/48004 • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •