CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 76%CPEs: 70EXPL: 4CVE-2018-1270 – spring-framework: Possible RCE via spring messaging
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1270
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. Spring Framework, en versiones 5.0 anteriores a la 5.0.5 y versiones 4.3 anteriores a la 4.3.15, así como versiones más antiguas no soportadas, permite que las aplicaciones expongan STOMP en endpoints WebSocket con un simple agente STOMP en memoria a través del módulo spring-messaging. Un usuario (o atacante) malicioso puede manipular un mensaje al agente que desemboca en un ataque de ejecución remota de código. Pivotal Spring Java Framework versions 5.0.x and below suffer from a remote code execution vulnerability. • https://github.com/CaledoniaProject/CVE-2018-1270 https://github.com/Venscor/CVE-2018-1270 https://github.com/tafamace/CVE-2018-1270 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103696 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2939 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4ed49b103f64a0cecb38064f26cbf1389afc12124653da2d35166dbe%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 67EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1272 – spring-framework: Multipart content pollution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1272
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, provide client-side support for multipart requests. When Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux server application (server A) receives input from a remote client, and then uses that input to make a multipart request to another server (server B), it can be exposed to an attack, where an extra multipart is inserted in the content of the request from server A, causing server B to use the wrong value for a part it expects. This could to lead privilege escalation, for example, if the part content represents a username or user roles. Spring Framework, en versiones 5.0 anteriores a la 5.0.5 y versiones 4.3 anteriores a la 4.3.15, así como versiones más antiguas no soportadas, proporciona soporte del lado de cliente a peticiones multipart. Cuando las aplicaciones Spring MVC o Spring WebFlux (servidor A) reciben entradas de un cliente remoto y, a continuación, emplea esa entrada para realizar una petición multipart a otro servidor (servidor B), pueden verse expuestas a un ataque en el que un multipart extra se inserta en el contenido de la petición del servidor A. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103697 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1320 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-1272 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan20 • CWE-88: Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection') •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 72EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1271 – spring-framework: Directory traversal vulnerability with static resources on Windows filesystems
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1271
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack. Spring Framework, en versiones 5.0 anteriores a la 5.0.5 y versiones 4.3 anteriores a la 4.3.15, así como versiones más antiguas no soportadas, permite que las aplicaciones configuren Spring MVC para que sirva recursos estáticos (por ejemplo, CSS, JS o imágenes). Cuando se sirven recursos estáticos desde un sistema de archivos en Windows (en contraposición a classpath o a ServletContext), un usuario malicioso puede enviar una petición mediante una URL especialmente manipulada que puede llevar a un ataque de salto de directorio. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103699 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1320 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2939 https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-1271 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html https: • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 87%CPEs: 174EXPL: 1CVE-2017-5645 – log4j: Socket receiver deserialization vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5645
In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2015-2607
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-2607
Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager component in Oracle Commerce Platform 3.0.2, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 11.0, and 11.1 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Content Acquisition System. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en el componente Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager en Oracle Commerce Platform 3.0.2, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 11.0 y 11.1, permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad a través de vectores desconocidos relacionados con Content Acquisition System. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2015-2367936.html •