Page 2 of 11 results (0.027 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 49EXPL: 1

A user can tell curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 to require a successful upgrade to TLS when speaking to an IMAP, POP3 or FTP server (`--ssl-reqd` on the command line or`CURLOPT_USE_SSL` set to `CURLUSESSL_CONTROL` or `CURLUSESSL_ALL` withlibcurl). This requirement could be bypassed if the server would return a properly crafted but perfectly legitimate response.This flaw would then make curl silently continue its operations **withoutTLS** contrary to the instructions and expectations, exposing possibly sensitive data in clear text over the network. Un usuario puede decirle a curl versiones posteriores a 7.20.0 incluyéndola , y versiones anteriores a 7.78.0 incluyéndola, que requiera una actualización con éxito a TLS cuando hable con un servidor IMAP, POP3 o FTP ("--ssl-reqd" en la línea de comandos o "CURLOPT_USE_SSL" configurado como "CURLUSESSL_CONTROL" o "CURLUSESSL_ALL" conlibcurl). Este requisito podría ser omitido si el servidor devolviera una respuesta correctamente diseñada pero perfectamente legítima. Este fallo haría que curl continuara silenciosamente sus operaciones **withoutTLS** en contra de las instrucciones y expectativas, exponiendo posiblemente datos confidenciales en texto sin cifrar a través de la red A flaw was found in curl. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/29 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1334111 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/09/msg00022.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/08/msg00017.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APOAK4X73EJTAPTSVT7IRVDMUWVXNWGD https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RWLEC6YVEM2HWUBX67 • CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 46EXPL: 1

When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send back multiple responses at once that curl caches. curl would then upgrade to TLS but not flush the in-queue of cached responses but instead continue using and trustingthe responses it got *before* the TLS handshake as if they were authenticated.Using this flaw, it allows a Man-In-The-Middle attacker to first inject the fake responses, then pass-through the TLS traffic from the legitimate server and trick curl into sending data back to the user thinking the attacker's injected data comes from the TLS-protected server. Cuando en curl versiones posteriores a 7.20.0 incluyéndola, y versiones anteriores a 7.78.0 incluyéndola, se conecta a un servidor IMAP o POP3 para recuperar datos usando STARTTLS para actualizar a la seguridad TLS, el servidor puede responder y enviar múltiples respuestas a la vez que curl almacena en caché. curl entonces actualizaría a TLS pero no vaciaría la cola de respuestas almacenadas en caché, sino que continuaría usando y confiando en las respuestas que obtuvo *antes* del protocolo de enlace TLS como si estuvieran autenticadas. Usando este fallo, permite a un atacante de tipo Man-In-The-Middle inyectar primero las respuestas falsas, luego pasar mediante el tráfico TLS del servidor legítimo y engañar a curl para que envíe datos de vuelta al usuario pensando que los datos inyectados por el atacante provienen del servidor protegido por TLS A flaw was found in curl. The flaw lies in how curl handles cached or pipelined responses that it receives from either a IMAP, POP3, SMTP or FTP server before the TLS upgrade using STARTTLS. In such a scenario curl even after upgrading to TLS would trust these cached responses treating them as valid and authenticated and use them. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/29 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1334763 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/09/msg00022.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/08/msg00017.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APOAK4X73EJTAPTSVT7IRVDMUWVXNWGD https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RWLEC6YVEM2HWUBX67 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 11EXPL: 1

In librt in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.34, sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mq_notify.c mishandles certain NOTIFY_REMOVED data, leading to a NULL pointer dereference. NOTE: this vulnerability was introduced as a side effect of the CVE-2021-33574 fix. En librt en la Biblioteca C de GNU (también se conoce como glibc) versiones hasta 2.34, el archivo sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mq_notify.c, maneja inapropiadamente determinados datos NOTIFY_REMOVED, conllevando una desreferencia de puntero NULL. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad se introdujo como efecto secundario de la corrección de CVE-2021-33574 • https://blog.tuxcare.com/cve/tuxcare-team-identifies-cve-2021-38604-a-new-vulnerability-in-glibc https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GYEXYM37RCJWJ6B5KQUYQI4NZBDDYSXP https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-24 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210909-0005 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28213 https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4cc79c217744743077bf7a0ec5e0a4318f1e6641 https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git%3Ba&# • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 15EXPL: 1

Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept floating-point numbers as untrusted input, as demonstrated by a 1e300 argument to c_double.from_param. This occurs because sprintf is used unsafely. Python versiones 3.x hasta 3.9.1, presenta un desbordamiento de búfer en la función PyCArg_repr en el archivo _ctypes/callproc.c, que puede conllevar a una ejecución de código remota en determinadas aplicaciones de Python que aceptan números de punto flotante como entrada no confiable, como es demostrado por un argumento 1e300 para c_double.from_param.&#xa0;Esto ocurre porque sprintf es usado de manera no segura A flaw was found in python. A stack-based buffer overflow was discovered in the ctypes module provided within Python. • https://bugs.python.org/issue42938 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24239 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/04/msg00005.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/02/msg00013.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/05/msg00024.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BRHOCQYX3QLDGDQGTWQAUUT2G • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

In Python 3 through 3.9.0, the Lib/test/multibytecodec_support.py CJK codec tests call eval() on content retrieved via HTTP. En Python versiones 3 hasta 3.9.0, las pruebas del códec CJK del archivo Lib/test/multibytecodec_support.py llaman a la función eval() en el contenido recuperado por medio de HTTP In Python3's Lib/test/multibytecodec_support.py CJK codec tests call eval() on content retrieved via HTTP. • https://bugs.python.org/issue41944 https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/2ef5caa58febc8968e670e39e3d37cf8eef3cab8 https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/43e523103886af66d6c27cd72431b5d9d14cd2a9 https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/6c6c256df3636ff6f6136820afaefa5a10a3ac33 https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/b664a1df4ee71d3760ab937653b10997081b1794 https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/e912e945f2960029d039d3390ea08835ad39374b https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https:/&# • CWE-95: Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') •