CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 14%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2021-33037 – Incorrect Transfer-Encoding handling with HTTP/1.0
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-33037
Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding. Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.6, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.46 y versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.66, no analizaban correctamente el encabezado de petición HTTP transfer-encoding en algunas circunstancias, conllevando a la posibilidad de contrabando de peticiones cuando se usaba con un proxy inverso. Específicamente: - Tomcat ignoraba incorrectamente el encabezado de codificación de transferencia si el cliente declaraba que sólo aceptaría una respuesta HTTP/1.0; - Tomcat honraba la codificación de identificación; y - Tomcat no se aseguraba de que, si estaba presente, la codificación en trozos fuera la codificación final • https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r290aee55b72811fd19e75ac80f6143716c079170c5671b96932ed44b%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r40f921575aee8d7d34e53182f862c45cbb8f3d898c9d4e865c2ec262%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r612a79269b0d5e5780c62dfd34286a8037232fec0bc6f1a7e60c9381%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc6ef52453bb996a98cb45442871a1db56b7c349939e45d829bf9ae37%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https:/ • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 1CVE-2021-33560 – libgcrypt: mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-33560
Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP. Libgcrypt versiones anteriores a 1.8.8 y versiones 1.9.x anteriores a 1.9.3, maneja inapropiadamente el cifrado de ElGamal porque carece de cegado de exponentes para hacer frente a un ataque de canal lateral contra la función mpi_powm, y el tamaño de la ventana no se elige apropiadamente. Esto, por ejemplo, afecta el uso de ElGamal en OpenPGP. A side-channel attack flaw was found in the way libgcrypt implemented Elgamal encryption. • https://github.com/IBM/PGP-client-checker-CVE-2021-33560 https://dev.gnupg.org/T5305 https://dev.gnupg.org/T5328 https://dev.gnupg.org/T5466 https://dev.gnupg.org/rCe8b7f10be275bcedb5fc05ed4837a89bfd605c61 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00021.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BKKTOIGFW2SGN3DO2UHHVZ7MJSYN4AAB https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R7OAPCUGPF3VLA7QAJUQSL255D4ITVTL • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2021-33880
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-33880
The aaugustin websockets library before 9.1 for Python has an Observable Timing Discrepancy on servers when HTTP Basic Authentication is enabled with basic_auth_protocol_factory(credentials=...). An attacker may be able to guess a password via a timing attack. La biblioteca aaugustin websockets versiones anteriores a 9.1, para Python presenta una Discrepancia de Sincronización Observable en servidores cuando la Autenticación Básica HTTP está habilitada con basic_auth_protocol_factory(credentials=...). Un atacante puede ser capaz de adivinar una contraseña por medio de un ataque de sincronización • https://github.com/aaugustin/websockets/commit/547a26b685d08cac0aa64e5e65f7867ac0ea9bc0 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 49EXPL: 0CVE-2021-22118 – spring-web: (re)creating the temporary storage directory could result in a privilege escalation within WebFlux application
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22118
In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.15 and versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.7, a WebFlux application is vulnerable to a privilege escalation: by (re)creating the temporary storage directory, a locally authenticated malicious user can read or modify files that have been uploaded to the WebFlux application, or overwrite arbitrary files with multipart request data. En Spring Framework, versiones 5.2.x anteriores a 5.2.15 y versiones 5.3.x anteriores a 5.3.7, una aplicación WebFlux es vulnerable a una escalada de privilegios: al (re)crear el directorio de almacenamiento temporal, un usuario malicioso autenticado localmente puede leer o modificar archivos que han sido subidos a la aplicación WebFlux, o sobrescribir archivos arbitrarios con petición de datos de múltiples partes • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210713-0005 https://tanzu.vmware.com/security/cve-2021-22118 https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-22118 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974854 • CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management CWE-281: Improper Preservation of Permissions CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 1CVE-2020-27618 – glibc: iconv when processing invalid multi-byte input sequences fails to advance the input state, which could result in an infinite loop
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-27618
The iconv function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.32 and earlier, when processing invalid multi-byte input sequences in IBM1364, IBM1371, IBM1388, IBM1390, and IBM1399 encodings, fails to advance the input state, which could lead to an infinite loop in applications, resulting in a denial of service, a different vulnerability from CVE-2016-10228. La función iconv en la biblioteca GNU C (también se conoce como glibc o libc6) versiones 2.32 y anteriores, cuando se procesa secuencias de entrada de múltiples bytes no validas en codificaciones IBM1364, IBM1371, IBM1388, IBM1390 e IBM1399, presenta un fallo al avanzar el estado de la entrada, lo que podría conllevar a un bucle infinito en las aplicaciones, resultando en una denegación de servicio, una vulnerabilidad diferente de CVE-2016-10228 A flaw was found in glibc. If an attacker provides the iconv function with invalid multi-byte input sequences in IBM1364, IBM1371, IBM1388, IBM1390, IBM1399 encodings, it fails to advance the input state, which could lead to an infinite loop in applications, resulting in a denial of service. • https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-07 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210401-0006 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19519#c21 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26224 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-27618 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi? • CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •