Page 2 of 10 results (0.026 seconds)

CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 6%CPEs: 206EXPL: 5

In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.2 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. En las versiones de jQuery mayores o iguales a 1.2 y anteriores a la versión 3.5.0, se puede ejecutar HTML desde fuentes no seguras, incluso después de desinfectarlo, a uno de los métodos de manipulación DOM de jQuery (es decir .html (), .append () y otros). código no seguro Este problema está corregido en jQuery 3.5.0. A Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in JQuery. This flaw allows an attacker with the ability to supply input to the ‘HTML’ function to inject Javascript into the page where that input is rendered, and have it delivered by the browser. jQuery version 1.2 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49766 https://github.com/0xAJ2K/CVE-2020-11022-CVE-2020-11023 https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2020-11022 https://github.com/Snorlyd/https-nj.gov---CVE-2020-11022 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00067.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00085.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-11/msg00039.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/162159/jQuery-1.2& • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 429EXPL: 0

A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. Una vulnerabilidad fue encontrada en Hibernate-Validator. La anotación del validador SafeHtml no puede sanear apropiadamente las cargas útiles que consisten en código potencialmente malicioso en los comentarios e instrucciones HTML. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0159 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0160 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0161 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0164 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0445 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10219 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4f8b4e2541be4234946e40d55859273a7eec0f4901e8080ce2406fe6%40%3Cnotifications.accumulo.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4f92d7f7682dcff92722fa947f9e6f8ba2227c5dc3e11ba0911 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 218EXPL: 4

jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. jQuery, en versiones anteriores a 3.4.0, como es usado en Drupal, Backdrop CMS, y otros productos, maneja mal jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) debido a la contaminación de Object.prototype. Si un objeto fuente no sanitizado contenía una propiedad enumerable __proto__, podría extender el Object.prototype nativo. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability was found in jquery. Untrusted JSON passed to the `extend` function could lead to modifying objects up the prototype chain, including the global Object. • https://github.com/isacaya/CVE-2019-11358 https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2019-11358 https://github.com/Snorlyd/https-nj.gov---CVE-2019-11358 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00025.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152787/dotCMS-5.1.1-Vulnerable-Dependencies.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153237/RetireJS-CORS-Issue-Script-Execution.html http://packetstormsecurity.c • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1095EXPL: 0

Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a speculative buffer overflow and side-channel analysis. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y la predicción de ramas podría permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un desbordamiento de búfer especulativo y el análisis de canal lateral. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of instructions past bounds check. The flaw relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code and the fact that memory writes occur to an address which depends on the untrusted value. Such writes cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2384 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2390 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2395 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1946 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0174 https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/685359 https://help.ecostruxureit.com/display/public/UADCE725/Security+fixes+in+StruxureWare+Data+Center+Expert+v7.6.0 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180823-0001 https://www.oracle.com/s • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 21EXPL: 0

The Linux kernel 4.15 has a Buffer Overflow via an SNDRV_SEQ_IOCTL_SET_CLIENT_POOL ioctl write operation to /dev/snd/seq by a local user. El kernel de Linux 4.15 tiene un desbordamiento de búfer mediante una operación de escritura ioctl SNDRV_SEQ_IOCTL_SET_CLIENT_POOL en /dev/snd/seq por un usuario local. ALSA sequencer core initializes the event pool on demand by invoking snd_seq_pool_init() when the first write happens and the pool is empty. A user can reset the pool size manually via ioctl concurrently, and this may lead to UAF or out-of-bound access. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-03/msg00067.html http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2018-February/132026.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103605 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2384 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2390 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2395 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1483 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1487 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •