Page 2 of 25 results (0.015 seconds)

CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 2%CPEs: 81EXPL: 5

In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. En jQuery versiones mayores o iguales a 1.0.3 y anteriores a la versión 3.5.0, passing HTML contiene elementos de fuentes no seguras – incluso después de sanearlo – para uno de los métodos de manipulación de jQuery ´s DOM ( i.e. html t(), adjunto (), y otros ) podrían ejecutar códigos no seguros. Este problema está corregido en JQuery 3.5.0. A flaw was found in jQuery. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49767 https://github.com/0xAJ2K/CVE-2020-11022-CVE-2020-11023 https://github.com/Cybernegro/CVE-2020-11023 https://github.com/Snorlyd/https-nj.gov---CVE-2020-11023 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00067.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00085.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-11/msg00039.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/162160/jQuery-1.0.3-Cross& • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0 to 2.4.41, redirects configured with mod_rewrite that were intended to be self-referential might be fooled by encoded newlines and redirect instead to an an unexpected URL within the request URL. En Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.0 hasta 2.4.41, los redireccionamientos configurados con mod_rewrite que pretendían ser autorreferenciales podrían ser engañados por nuevas líneas codificadas y redireccionadas en lugar de una URL inesperada dentro de la URL de petición. A flaw was found in Apache HTTP Server (httpd) versions 2.4.0 to 2.4.41. Redirects configured with mod_rewrite that were intended to be self-referential might be fooled by encoded newlines and redirected instead to an unexpected URL within the request URL. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00002.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/04/03/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/04/04/1 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06f0d87ebb6d59ed8379633f36f72f5b1f79cadfda72ede0830b42cf%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r09bb998baee74a2c316446bd1a41ae7f8d7049d09d9ff991471e8775%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread • CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 21EXPL: 0

In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0 to 2.4.41, mod_proxy_ftp may use uninitialized memory when proxying to a malicious FTP server. En Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.0 hasta 2.4.41, mod_proxy_ftp puede usar memoria no inicializada cuando al enviar un proxy hacia un servidor FTP malicioso. A flaw was found in Apache's HTTP server (httpd) .The mod_proxy_ftp module may use uninitialized memory with proxying to a malicious FTP server. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00002.html https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06f0d87ebb6d59ed8379633f36f72f5b1f79cadfda72ede0830b42cf%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r09bb998baee74a2c316446bd1a41ae7f8d7049d09d9ff991471e8775%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1719675306dfbeaceff3dc63ccad3de2d5615919ca3c13276948b9ac%40%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r26706d75f6b9080ca6a29955aeb8 • CWE-456: Missing Initialization of a Variable CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 38EXPL: 18

When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that may be surprising. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99, Tomcat shipped with an AJP Connector enabled by default that listened on all configured IP addresses. It was expected (and recommended in the security guide) that this Connector would be disabled if not required. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49039 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48143 https://github.com/sgdream/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/xindongzhuaizhuai/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/laolisafe/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/sv3nbeast/CVE-2020-1938-Tomact-file_include-file_read https://github.com/fairyming/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/dacade/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/Hancheng-Lei/Hacking-Vulnerability-CVE-2020-1938-Ghostcat https://github.com/w4fz5uck5& • CWE-285: Improper Authorization •

CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 0

In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99 the HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. En Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.0 hasta 7.0.99, el código de análisis del encabezado HTTP utilizó un enfoque para el análisis de fin de línea que permitió a algunos encabezados HTTP no válidos ser analizados como válidos. Esto conllevó a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido en una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r127f76181aceffea2bd4711b03c595d0f115f63e020348fe925a916c%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r441c1f30a252bf14b07396286f6abd8089ce4240e91323211f1a2d75%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r660cd379afe346f10d72c0eaa8459ccc95d83aff181671b7e9076919%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •