CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 6%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3711 – SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3711
In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/26/2 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=59f5e75f3bced8fc0e130d72a3f582cf7b480b46 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r18995de860f0e63635f3008fd2a6aca82394249476d21691e7c59c9e%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rad5d9f83f0d11fb3f8bb148d179b8a9ad7c6a17f18d70e5805a713d1%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202209-02 https://security.ge • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 37%CPEs: 25EXPL: 4CVE-2021-23017 – Nginx 1.20.0 - Denial of Service (DOS)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23017
A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory overwrite, resulting in worker process crash or potential other impact. Se identificó un problema de seguridad en el solucionador de nginx, que podría permitir a un atacante que pueda falsificar paquetes UDP desde el servidor DNS para causar una sobrescritura de memoria de 1 byte, lo que causaría un bloqueo del proceso de trabajo u otro impacto potencial A flaw was found in nginx. An off-by-one error while processing DNS responses allows a network attacker to write a dot character out of bounds in a heap allocated buffer which can allow overwriting the least significant byte of next heap chunk metadata likely leading to a remote code execution in certain circumstances. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. Nginx version 1.20.0 suffers from a denial of service vulnerability. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50973 https://github.com/M507/CVE-2021-23017-PoC https://github.com/ShivamDey/CVE-2021-23017 https://github.com/lakshit1212/CVE-2021-23017-PoC http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-announce/2021/000300.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167720/Nginx-1.20.0-Denial-Of-Service.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r37e6b2165f7c910d8e15fd54f4697857619ad2625f56583802004009%40%3Cnotifications.apisix.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4d4966221ca399 • CWE-193: Off-by-one Error •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 136EXPL: 1CVE-2021-29425 – Possible limited path traversal vulnerabily in Apache Commons IO
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-29425
In Apache Commons IO before 2.7, When invoking the method FileNameUtils.normalize with an improper input string, like "//../foo", or "\\..\foo", the result would be the same value, thus possibly providing access to files in the parent directory, but not further above (thus "limited" path traversal), if the calling code would use the result to construct a path value. En Apache Commons IO versiones anteriores a 2.7, Cuando se invoca el método FileNameUtils.normalize con una cadena de entrada inapropiada, como "//../foo" o "\\..\ foo", el resultado sería el mismo valor, por lo que posiblemente proporcionar acceso a archivos en el directorio principal, pero no más arriba (por lo tanto, salto de ruta "limited"), si el código de llamada usara el resultado para construir un valor de ruta • https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-556 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r01b4a1fcdf3311c936ce33d75a9398b6c255f00c1a2f312ac21effe1%40%3Cnotifications.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0bfa8f7921abdfae788b1f076a12f73a92c93cc0a6e1083bce0027c5%40%3Cnotifications.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0d73e2071d1f1afe1a15da14c5b6feb2cf17e3871168d5a3c8451436%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1c2f4683c35696cf6f863e3c107e37ec41305b1930dd40c17260de71%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E https:/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 48EXPL: 6CVE-2021-23337 – Command Injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23337
Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function. Las versiones de Lodash anteriores a la 4.17.21 son vulnerables a la inyección de comandos a través de la función de plantilla A flaw was found in nodejs-lodash. A command injection flaw is possible through template variables. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://github.com/lodash/lodash/blob/ddfd9b11a0126db2302cb70ec9973b66baec0975/lodash.js%23L14851 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210312-0006 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGFUJIONWEBJARS-1074932 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARS-1074930 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARSBOWER-1074928 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARSBOWERGITHUBLODASH-1074931 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARSNPM-1074929 https://snyk. • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 42EXPL: 6CVE-2020-28500 – Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-28500
Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the toNumber, trim and trimEnd functions. Las versiones de Lodash anteriores a la 4.17.21 son vulnerables a la denegación de servicio por expresiones regulares (ReDoS) a través de las funciones toNumber, trim y trimEnd A flaw was found in nodejs-lodash. A Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the toNumber, trim and trimEnd functions is possible. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://github.com/lodash/lodash/blob/npm/trimEnd.js%23L8 https://github.com/lodash/lodash/pull/5065 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210312-0006 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGFUJIONWEBJARS-1074896 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARS-1074894 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARSBOWER-1074892 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARSBOWERGITHUBLODASH-1074895 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARSNPM&# • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •