CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 76EXPL: 1CVE-2018-8032
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-8032
Apache Axis 1.x up to and including 1.4 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack in the default servlet/services. Apache Axis en versiones 1.x hasta la 1.4 (incluida) es vulnerable a un ataque de Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) en el servlet/services por defecto. • https://github.com/cairuojin/CVE-2018-8032 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/axis-java-dev/201807.mbox/%3CJIRA.13170716.1531060536000.93536.1531060560060%40Atlassian.JIRA%3E https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2924 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3b89bc9e9d055db7eba8835ff6501f3f5db99d2a0928ec0be9b1d17b%40%3Cjava-dev.axis.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d06ed5e4eeb77d00e8d594ec01ee8ee1cba173a01ac4b18f1579d041%40%3Cjava-dev.axis.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11& • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 41EXPL: 0CVE-2018-8013
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-8013
In Apache Batik 1.x before 1.10, when deserializing subclass of `AbstractDocument`, the class takes a string from the inputStream as the class name which then use it to call the no-arg constructor of the class. Fix was to check the class type before calling newInstance in deserialization. En Apache Batik en versiones 1.x anteriores a la 1.10, cuando se deserializa la subclase de "AbstractDocument", la clase toma una cadena de inputStream como el nombre de clase y lo emplea para llamar al constructor no-arg de la clase. La solución fue comprobar el tipo de clase antes de llamar a newInstance durante la deserialización. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104252 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040995 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9e90b4d1cf6ea87a79bb506541140dfbf4801f4463a7cee08126ee44%40%3Ccommits.xmlgraphics.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc0a31867796043fbe59113fb654fe8b13309fe04f8935acb8d0fab19%40%3Ccommits.xmlgraphics.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018&#x • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 51EXPL: 1CVE-2018-1304 – tomcat: Incorrect handling of empty string URL in security constraints can lead to unintended exposure of resources
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1304
The URL pattern of "" (the empty string) which exactly maps to the context root was not correctly handled in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.4, 8.5.0 to 8.5.27, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.49 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.84 when used as part of a security constraint definition. This caused the constraint to be ignored. It was, therefore, possible for unauthorised users to gain access to web application resources that should have been protected. Only security constraints with a URL pattern of the empty string were affected. El patrón de URL "" (la cadena vacía) que mapea exactamente al root de contexto no se gestionó correctamente en Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 a 9.0.4, 8.5.0 a 8.5.27, 8.0.0.RC1 a 8.0.49 y 7.0.0 a 7.0.84 al emplearse como parte de una definición de limitación de seguridad. • https://github.com/knqyf263/CVE-2018-1304 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103170 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040427 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0465 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0466 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1320 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1447 https://access.redha • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 50EXPL: 1CVE-2018-1305 – tomcat: Late application of security constraints can lead to resource exposure for unauthorised users
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1305
Security constraints defined by annotations of Servlets in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.4, 8.5.0 to 8.5.27, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.49 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.84 were only applied once a Servlet had been loaded. Because security constraints defined in this way apply to the URL pattern and any URLs below that point, it was possible - depending on the order Servlets were loaded - for some security constraints not to be applied. This could have exposed resources to users who were not authorised to access them. Las restricciones de seguridad definidas por anotaciones en Servlets en Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 a 9.0.4, 8.5.0 a 8.5.27, 8.0.0.RC1 a 8.0.49 y 7.0.0 a 7.0.84 solo se aplicaban una vez se haya cargado el Servlet. Debido a que las restricciones de seguridad definidas de esta forma se aplican al patrón URL y a cualquier URL bajo ese punto, era posible (dependiendo del orden en el qe se cargan los Servlets) que no se aplicasen algunas restricciones de seguridad. • https://github.com/Pa55w0rd/CVE-2018-1305 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103144 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040428 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0465 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0466 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1320 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2939 https://access.redha • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 87%CPEs: 174EXPL: 1CVE-2017-5645 – log4j: Socket receiver deserialization vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5645
In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •