CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 1CVE-2021-44532 – nodejs: Certificate Verification Bypass via String Injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44532
Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option. Node.js versiones anteriores a 12.22.9, versiones anteriores a 14.18.3, versiones anteriores a 16.13.2 y versiones anteriores a 17.3.1, convierte los SAN (Subject Alternative Names) a un formato de cadena. usa esta cadena para comprobar los certificados de los compañeros con los nombres de host cuando comprueba las conexiones. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-44532 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040846 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-296: Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2021-44531 – nodejs: Improper handling of URI Subject Alternative Names
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44531
Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option. Aceptar tipos de nombres alternativos de sujeto (SAN) arbitrarios, a menos que una PKI esté definida específicamente para usar un tipo de SAN concreto, puede resultar en una omisión de los intermediarios con restricción de nombre. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-44531 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040839 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 8.2EPSS: 1%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2022-21824 – nodejs: Prototype pollution via console.table properties
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-21824
Due to the formatting logic of the "console.table()" function it was not safe to allow user controlled input to be passed to the "properties" parameter while simultaneously passing a plain object with at least one property as the first parameter, which could be "__proto__". The prototype pollution has very limited control, in that it only allows an empty string to be assigned to numerical keys of the object prototype.Node.js >= 12.22.9, >= 14.18.3, >= 16.13.2, and >= 17.3.1 use a null protoype for the object these properties are being assigned to. Debido a la lógica de formato de la función "console.table()" no era seguro permitir que pasara la entrada controlada por el usuario al parámetro "properties" mientras pasaba simultáneamente un objeto plano con al menos una propiedad como primer parámetro, que podía ser "__proto__". La contaminación del prototipo presenta un control muy limitado, ya que sólo permite asignar una cadena vacía a las claves numéricas del prototipo del objeto.Node.js versiones posteriores a 12.22.9 incluyéndola, versiones posteriores a 14.18.3 incluyéndola, versiones posteriores a 16.13.2 incluyéndola, y versiones posteriores a 17.3.1 incluyéndola, usan un prototipo nulo para el objeto al que es asignada estas propiedades. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1431042 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00006.html https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220729-0004 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2 • CWE-471: Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID) CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3712 – Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3712
ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/26/2 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-244969.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=94d23fcff9b2a7a8368dfe52214d5c2569882c11 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=ccb0a11145ee72b042d10593a64eaf9e8a55ec12 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r18995de860f0e63635f3008f • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 6%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3711 – SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3711
In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/26/2 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=59f5e75f3bced8fc0e130d72a3f582cf7b480b46 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r18995de860f0e63635f3008fd2a6aca82394249476d21691e7c59c9e%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rad5d9f83f0d11fb3f8bb148d179b8a9ad7c6a17f18d70e5805a713d1%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202209-02 https://security.ge • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •