Page 2 of 12 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 3.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 23EXPL: 1

A temp directory creation vulnerability exists in all versions of Guava, allowing an attacker with access to the machine to potentially access data in a temporary directory created by the Guava API com.google.common.io.Files.createTempDir(). By default, on unix-like systems, the created directory is world-readable (readable by an attacker with access to the system). The method in question has been marked @Deprecated in versions 30.0 and later and should not be used. For Android developers, we recommend choosing a temporary directory API provided by Android, such as context.getCacheDir(). For other Java developers, we recommend migrating to the Java 7 API java.nio.file.Files.createTempDirectory() which explicitly configures permissions of 700, or configuring the Java runtime's java.io.tmpdir system property to point to a location whose permissions are appropriately configured. • https://github.com/google/guava/commit/fec0dbc4634006a6162cfd4d0d09c962073ddf40 https://github.com/google/guava/issues/4011 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r007add131977f4f576c232b25e024249a3d16f66aad14a4b52819d21%40%3Ccommon-issues.hadoop.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r07ed3e4417ad043a27bee7bb33322e9bfc7d7e6d1719b8e3dfd95c14%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r161b87f8037bbaff400194a63cd2016c9a69f5949f06dcc79beeab54%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r215b3d50f56faeb2f9383505f3e62faa9f549bb • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-378: Creation of Temporary File With Insecure Permissions CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0

Apache HttpClient versions prior to version 4.5.13 and 5.0.3 can misinterpret malformed authority component in request URIs passed to the library as java.net.URI object and pick the wrong target host for request execution. Apache HttpClient versiones anteriores a 4.5.13 y 5.0.3, pueden interpretar inapropiadamente el componente authority malformado en las peticiones URI pasadas ??a la biblioteca como objeto java.net.URI y elegir el host de destino equivocado para una ejecución de la petición • https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r03bbc318c81be21f5c8a9b85e34f2ecc741aa804a8e43b0ef2c37749%40%3Cissues.maven.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r043a75acdeb52b15dd5e9524cdadef4202e6a5228644206acf9363f9%40%3Cdev.hive.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06cf3ca5c8ceb94b39cd24a73d4e96153b485a7dac88444dd876accb%40%3Cissues.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0a75b8f0f72f3e18442dc56d33f3827b905f2fe5b7ba48997436f5d1%40%3Cissues.solr.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0bebe6f9808ac7bdf572873b4fa96a29c6398c90dab29f131f3ebffe%40% • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0

The ZlibDecoders in Netty 4.1.x before 4.1.46 allow for unbounded memory allocation while decoding a ZlibEncoded byte stream. An attacker could send a large ZlibEncoded byte stream to the Netty server, forcing the server to allocate all of its free memory to a single decoder. El ZlibDecoders en Netty versiones 4.1.x anteriores a 4.1.46, permite una asignación de memoria ilimitada mientras decodifican un flujo de bytes de ZlibEncoded. Un atacante podría enviar una secuencia de bytes de ZlibEncoded grande hacia el servidor de Netty, forzando al servidor a asignar toda su memoria liberada a un único decodificador. A flaw was found in Netty in the way it handles the amount of data it compresses and decompresses. • https://github.com/netty/netty/compare/netty-4.1.45.Final...netty-4.1.46.Final https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/6168 https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/9924 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r14446ed58208cb6d97b6faa6ebf145f1cf2c70c0886c0c133f4d3b6f%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r255ed239e65d0596812362adc474bee96caf7ba042c7ad2f3c62cec7%40%3Cissues.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r281882fdf9ea89aac02fd2f92786693a956aac2ce9840cce87c7df6b%40%3Ccommits.zookeeper.apache. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 429EXPL: 0

A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. Una vulnerabilidad fue encontrada en Hibernate-Validator. La anotación del validador SafeHtml no puede sanear apropiadamente las cargas útiles que consisten en código potencialmente malicioso en los comentarios e instrucciones HTML. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0159 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0160 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0161 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0164 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0445 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10219 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4f8b4e2541be4234946e40d55859273a7eec0f4901e8080ce2406fe6%40%3Cnotifications.accumulo.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4f92d7f7682dcff92722fa947f9e6f8ba2227c5dc3e11ba0911 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete. La librería de cliente Java de Apache Thrift, desde la versión 0.5.0 hasta la 0.11.0, puede omitir la validación de la negociación de SASL "isComplete" en la clase org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport. Una aserción utilizada para determinar si el handshake SASL se ha completado de manera exitosa podría deshabilitarse en los ajustes de producción, prohibiendo que la validación se complete. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/24/3 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106551 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2413 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/07c3cd5a2953a4b253eee4437b1397b1603d0f886437e19b657d2c54%40%3Ccommits.cassandra.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/187684ac8b94d55256253f5220cb55e8bd568afdf9a8a86e9bbb66c9%40%3Cdevnull.infra.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3d3b6849fcf4cd1e87703b3dde0d57aabeb9ba0193dc0cf3c97f545d%40%3Ccommits.cassandra.apache.org%3E https://lists.apa • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •