CVE-2018-14718 – jackson-databind: arbitrary code execution in slf4j-ext class
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-14718
FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging failure to block the slf4j-ext class from polymorphic deserialization. Las versiones 2.x de FasterXML jackson-databind anteriores a la 2.9.7 podrían permitir a los atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario aprovechando un fallo para bloquear la clase slf4j-ext de deserialización polimórfica. A flaw was discovered in jackson-databind, where it would permit polymorphic deserialization of a malicious object using slf4j classes. An attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106601 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0959 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0782 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1782 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1797 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1822 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1823 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2804 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2858& • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVE-2018-14719 – jackson-databind: arbitrary code execution in blaze-ds-opt and blaze-ds-core classes
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-14719
FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging failure to block the blaze-ds-opt and blaze-ds-core classes from polymorphic deserialization. Las versiones 2.x de FasterXML jackson-databind anteriores a la 2.9.7 podrían permitir a los atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario aprovechando un fallo para bloquear las clases blaze-ds-opt y blaze-ds-core de deserialización polimórfica. A flaw was discovered in jackson-databind, where it would permit polymorphic deserialization of a malicious object using blaze classes. An attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0959 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0782 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1782 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1797 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1822 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1823 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2804 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2858 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVE-2018-15756 – DoS Attack via Range Requests
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15756
Spring Framework, version 5.1, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.10, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.20, and older unsupported versions on the 4.2.x branch provide support for range requests when serving static resources through the ResourceHttpRequestHandler, or starting in 5.0 when an annotated controller returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. A malicious user (or attacker) can add a range header with a high number of ranges, or with wide ranges that overlap, or both, for a denial of service attack. This vulnerability affects applications that depend on either spring-webmvc or spring-webflux. Such applications must also have a registration for serving static resources (e.g. JS, CSS, images, and others), or have an annotated controller that returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105703 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/339fd112517e4873695b5115b96acdddbfc8f83b10598528d37c7d12%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77886fec378ee6064debb1efb6b464a4a0173b2ff0d151ed86d3a228%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7b156ee50ba3ecce87b33c06bf7a749d84ffee55e69bfb5eca88fcc3%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8a1fe70534fc52ff5c9db5ac29c55657f802cbefd7e9d9850c7052bd%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVE-2017-5645 – log4j: Socket receiver deserialization vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5645
In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVE-2015-0466
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0466
Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Retail Back Office component in Oracle Retail Applications 12.0, 12.0IN, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, 13.4, 14.0, and 14.1 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en el componente Oracle Retail Back Office en Oracle Retail Applications 12.0, 12.0IN, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, 13.4, 14.0, y 14.1 permite a atacantes remotos afectar la integridad a través de vectores desconocidos. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuapr2015-2365600.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74093 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032128 •