CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 110EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10086 – apache-commons-beanutils: does not suppresses the class property in PropertyUtilsBean by default
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10086
In Apache Commons Beanutils 1.9.2, a special BeanIntrospector class was added which allows suppressing the ability for an attacker to access the classloader via the class property available on all Java objects. We, however were not using this by default characteristic of the PropertyUtilsBean. En Apache Commons Beanutils 1.9.2, se agregó una clase especial BeanIntrospector que permite suprimir la capacidad de un atacante para acceder al cargador de clases a través de la propiedad de clase disponible en todos los objetos Java. Sin embargo, no se esta usando esta característica por defecto de PropertyUtilsBean. A flaw was found in the Apache Commons BeanUtils, where the class property in PropertyUtilsBean is not suppressed by default. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00007.html http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-announce/201908.mbox/%3cC628798F-315D-4428-8CB1-4ED1ECC958E4%40apache.org%3e https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4317 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0057 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0804 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0805 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0806 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2018-20685 – openssh: scp client improper directory name validation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-20685
In OpenSSH 7.9, scp.c in the scp client allows remote SSH servers to bypass intended access restrictions via the filename of . or an empty filename. The impact is modifying the permissions of the target directory on the client side. En OpenSSH 7.9, scp.c en el cliente scp permite que los servidores SSH omitan las restricciones de acceso planeadas mediante un nombre de archivo "." o un nombre de archivo vacío. El impacto consiste en modificar los permisos del directorio objetivo en el lado del cliente. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106531 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3702 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/scp.c.diff?r1=1.197&r2=1.198&f=h https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/6010c0303a422a9c5fa8860c061bf7105eb7f8b2 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00030.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201903-16 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007- • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 17%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5387 – HTTPD: sets environmental variable based on user supplied Proxy request header
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5387
The Apache HTTP Server through 2.4.23 follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. NOTE: the vendor states "This mitigation has been assigned the identifier CVE-2016-5387"; in other words, this is not a CVE ID for a vulnerability. El Apache HTTP Server hasta la versión 2.4.23 sigue a RFC 3875 sección 4.1.18 y por lo tanto no protege aplicaciones de la presencia de datos de clientes no confiables en ambiente variable de HTTP_PROXY, lo que puede permitir a atacantes remotos redireccionar el tráfico HTTP saliente de aplicación a un servidor proxy arbitrario a través de una cabecera Proxy manipulada en una petición HTTP, también conocido como problema "httpoxy". NOTA: el vendedor afirma "Se ha asignado a esta mitigación el identificador CVE-2016-5387"; en otras palabras, esto no es un CVE ID para una vulnerabilidad. It was discovered that httpd used the value of the Proxy header from HTTP requests to initialize the HTTP_PROXY environment variable for CGI scripts, which in turn was incorrectly used by certain HTTP client implementations to configure the proxy for outgoing HTTP requests. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-07/msg00059.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1624.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1625.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1648.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1649.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1650.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3623 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/797896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 3CVE-2016-5844 – libarchive: undefined behaviour (integer overflow) in iso parser
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5844
Integer overflow in the ISO parser in libarchive before 3.2.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted ISO file. Desbordamiento de entero en el analizador ISO en libarchive en versiones anteriores a 3.2.1 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) a través de un archivo ISO manipulado. Undefined behavior (signed integer overflow) was discovered in libarchive, in the ISO parser. A crafted file could potentially cause denial of service. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1844.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1850.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3657 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/23/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/24/4 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91808 http://www.securityt • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •