CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1CVE-2023-36632
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-36632
The legacy email.utils.parseaddr function in Python through 3.11.4 allows attackers to trigger "RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object" via a crafted argument. This argument is plausibly an untrusted value from an application's input data that was supposed to contain a name and an e-mail address. NOTE: email.utils.parseaddr is categorized as a Legacy API in the documentation of the Python email package. Applications should instead use the email.parser.BytesParser or email.parser.Parser class. NOTE: the vendor's perspective is that this is neither a vulnerability nor a bug. • https://docs.python.org/3/library/email.html https://docs.python.org/3/library/email.utils.html https://github.com/Daybreak2019/PoC_python3.9_Vul/blob/main/RecursionError-email.utils.parseaddr.py https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/103800 • CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 1CVE-2023-27043 – python: Parsing errors in email/_parseaddr.py lead to incorrect value in email address part of tuple
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-27043
The email module of Python through 3.11.3 incorrectly parses e-mail addresses that contain a special character. The wrong portion of an RFC2822 header is identified as the value of the addr-spec. In some applications, an attacker can bypass a protection mechanism in which application access is granted only after verifying receipt of e-mail to a specific domain (e.g., only @company.example.com addresses may be used for signup). This occurs in email/_parseaddr.py in recent versions of Python. • http://python.org https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/102988 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4ZAEFSFZDNBNJPNOUTLG5COISGQDLMGV https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/75DTHSTNOFFNAWHXKMDXS7EJWC6W2FUC https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ARI7VDSNTQVXRQFM6IK5GSSLEIYV4VZH https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BQAKLUJMHFGVBRDPEY5 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 4CVE-2023-24329 – python: urllib.parse url blocklisting bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-24329
An issue in the urllib.parse component of Python before 3.11.4 allows attackers to bypass blocklisting methods by supplying a URL that starts with blank characters. A flaw was found in the Python package. An issue in the urllib.parse component could allow attackers to bypass blocklisting methods by supplying a URL that starts with blank characters.This may lead to compromised Integrity. • https://github.com/JawadPy/CVE-2023-24329-Exploit https://github.com/Pandante-Central/CVE-2023-24329-codeql-test https://github.com/H4R335HR/CVE-2023-24329-PoC https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/102153 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/99421 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/09/msg00022.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6PEVICI7YNGGMSL3UCMWGE66QFLATH72 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 1CVE-2022-45061 – python: CPU denial of service via inefficient IDNA decoder
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-45061
An issue was discovered in Python before 3.11.1. An unnecessary quadratic algorithm exists in one path when processing some inputs to the IDNA (RFC 3490) decoder, such that a crafted, unreasonably long name being presented to the decoder could lead to a CPU denial of service. Hostnames are often supplied by remote servers that could be controlled by a malicious actor; in such a scenario, they could trigger excessive CPU consumption on the client attempting to make use of an attacker-supplied supposed hostname. For example, the attack payload could be placed in the Location header of an HTTP response with status code 302. A fix is planned in 3.11.1, 3.10.9, 3.9.16, 3.8.16, and 3.7.16. • https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/98433 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/05/msg00024.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00039.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2AOUKI72ACV6CHY2QUFO6VK2DNMVJ2MB https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/35YDIWCUMWTMDBWFRAVENFH6BLB65D6S https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4WBZJNS • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2022-42919 – python: local privilege escalation via the multiprocessing forkserver start method
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-42919
Python 3.9.x before 3.9.16 and 3.10.x before 3.10.9 on Linux allows local privilege escalation in a non-default configuration. The Python multiprocessing library, when used with the forkserver start method on Linux, allows pickles to be deserialized from any user in the same machine local network namespace, which in many system configurations means any user on the same machine. Pickles can execute arbitrary code. Thus, this allows for local user privilege escalation to the user that any forkserver process is running as. Setting multiprocessing.util.abstract_sockets_supported to False is a workaround. • https://github.com/python/cpython/compare/v3.10.8...v3.10.9 https://github.com/python/cpython/compare/v3.9.15...v3.9.16 https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/97514 https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/97514#issuecomment-1310277840 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FKGCQPIVHEAIJ77R3RSNSQWYBUDVWDKU https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/P2LHWWEI5OBQ6RELULMVU6KMDYG4WZXH https://lists.fedo • CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management •