CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 32%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1CVE-2018-14649 – ceph-iscsi-cli: rbd-target-api service runs in debug mode allowing for remote command execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-14649
It was found that ceph-isci-cli package as shipped by Red Hat Ceph Storage 2 and 3 is using python-werkzeug in debug shell mode. This is done by setting debug=True in file /usr/bin/rbd-target-api provided by ceph-isci-cli package. This allows unauthenticated attackers to access this debug shell and escalate privileges. Once an attacker has successfully connected to this debug shell they will be able to execute arbitrary commands remotely. These commands will run with the same privileges as of user executing the application which is using python-werkzeug with debug shell mode enabled. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105434 https://access.redhat.com/articles/3623521 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2837 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2838 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14649 https://github.com/ceph/ceph-iscsi-cli/issues/120 https://github.com/ceph/ceph-iscsi-cli/pull/121/commits/c3812075e30c76a800a961e7291087d357403f6b https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-14649 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id= • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') •
CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 1CVE-2017-18344 – Linux Kernel 4.14.7 (Ubuntu 16.04 / CentOS 7) - (KASLR & SMEP Bypass) Arbitrary File Read
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-18344
The timer_create syscall implementation in kernel/time/posix-timers.c in the Linux kernel before 4.14.8 doesn't properly validate the sigevent->sigev_notify field, which leads to out-of-bounds access in the show_timer function (called when /proc/$PID/timers is read). This allows userspace applications to read arbitrary kernel memory (on a kernel built with CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS and CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE). La implementación de llamada del sistema timer_create en kernel/time/posix-timers.c en el kernel de Linux en versiones anteriores a la 4.14.8 no valida correctamente el campo sigevent->sigev_notify, conduciendo a un acceso fuera de límites en la función show_timer (que se llama cuando se lee /proc/$PID/timers). Esto permite que las aplicaciones del espacio del usuario lean memoria del kernel arbitraria (en un kernel construido con CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS y CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE). The timer_create syscall implementation in kernel/time/posix-timers.c in the Linux kernel doesn't properly validate the sigevent->sigev_notify field, which leads to out-of-bounds access in the show_timer function. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45175 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104909 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041414 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3083 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3096 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3459 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3540 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3586 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3590 https:/ • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 92EXPL: 1CVE-2018-13405 – Linux (Ubuntu) - Other Users coredumps Can Be Read via setgid Directory and killpriv Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-13405
The inode_init_owner function in fs/inode.c in the Linux kernel through 3.16 allows local users to create files with an unintended group ownership, in a scenario where a directory is SGID to a certain group and is writable by a user who is not a member of that group. Here, the non-member can trigger creation of a plain file whose group ownership is that group. The intended behavior was that the non-member can trigger creation of a directory (but not a plain file) whose group ownership is that group. The non-member can escalate privileges by making the plain file executable and SGID. La función inode_init_owner en fs/inode.c en el kernel de Linux hasta la versión 3.16 permite a los usuarios locales crear archivos con una propiedad de grupo no deseada, en un escenario donde un directorio es SGID a un cierto grupo y es escribible por un usuario que no es miembro de ese grupo. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45033 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0fa3ecd87848c9c93c2c828ef4c3a8ca36ce46c7 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/07/13/2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106503 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3083 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3096 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0717 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA- • CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 23EXPL: 2CVE-2018-7750 – Paramiko 2.4.1 - Authentication Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-7750
transport.py in the SSH server implementation of Paramiko before 1.17.6, 1.18.x before 1.18.5, 2.0.x before 2.0.8, 2.1.x before 2.1.5, 2.2.x before 2.2.3, 2.3.x before 2.3.2, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 does not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests, as demonstrated by channel-open. A customized SSH client can simply skip the authentication step. transport.py en la implementación del servidor SSH de Paramiko, en versiones anteriores a la 1.17.6; versiones 1.18.x anteriores a la 1.18.5; versiones 2.0.x anteriores a la 2.0.8; versiones 2.1.x anteriores a la 2.1.5; versiones 2.2.x anteriores a la 2.2.3; versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.2 y versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.1, no comprueba adecuadamente si la autenticación se ha completado antes de procesar otras peticiones, tal y como demuestra channel-open. Un cliente SSH personalizado puede simplemente omitir el paso de autenticación. It was found that when acting as an SSH server, paramiko did not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests. A customized SSH client could use this to bypass authentication when accessing any resources controlled by paramiko. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45712 https://github.com/jm33-m0/CVE-2018-7750 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103713 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0591 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0646 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1124 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1125 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1213 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1274 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1328 https:&#x • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •