CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2013-0186 – EVM: Stored XSS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-0186
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ManageIQ EVM allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. Múltiples vulnerabilidades de tipo cross-site scripting (XSS) en ManageIQ EVM, permiten a atacantes remotos inyectar script web o HTML arbitrario por medio de vectores no especificados. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0215 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0186 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-0186 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895346 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 5CVE-2018-8897 – Microsoft Windows POP/MOV SS Local Privilege Elevation Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-8897
A statement in the System Programming Guide of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual (SDM) was mishandled in the development of some or all operating-system kernels, resulting in unexpected behavior for #DB exceptions that are deferred by MOV SS or POP SS, as demonstrated by (for example) privilege escalation in Windows, macOS, some Xen configurations, or FreeBSD, or a Linux kernel crash. The MOV to SS and POP SS instructions inhibit interrupts (including NMIs), data breakpoints, and single step trap exceptions until the instruction boundary following the next instruction (SDM Vol. 3A; section 6.8.3). (The inhibited data breakpoints are those on memory accessed by the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction itself.) Note that debug exceptions are not inhibited by the interrupt enable (EFLAGS.IF) system flag (SDM Vol. 3A; section 2.3). If the instruction following the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction is an instruction like SYSCALL, SYSENTER, INT 3, etc. that transfers control to the operating system at CPL < 3, the debug exception is delivered after the transfer to CPL < 3 is complete. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44697 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45024 https://github.com/can1357/CVE-2018-8897 https://github.com/nmulasmajic/CVE-2018-8897 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d8ba61ba58c88d5207c1ba2f7d9a2280e7d03be9 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/05/08/1 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/05/08/4 http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20190921-01-debug-en http: • CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1059 – dpdk: Information exposure in unchecked guest physical to host virtual address translations
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1059
The DPDK vhost-user interface does not check to verify that all the requested guest physical range is mapped and contiguous when performing Guest Physical Addresses to Host Virtual Addresses translations. This may lead to a malicious guest exposing vhost-user backend process memory. All versions before 18.02.1 are vulnerable. La interfaz vhost de usuario de DPDK no verifica que el rango físico invitado solicitado esté mapeado y sea contiguo al realizar traducciones de direcciones físicas de invitado a direcciones virtuales del host. Esto podría conducir a que un invitado malicioso exponga la memoria del proceso del backend del usuario vhost. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1267 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2038 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2102 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2524 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2018-1059 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544298 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3642-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3642-2 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-1059 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5293
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5293
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager 3.6 and earlier gives valid SLAAC IPv6 addresses to interfaces when "boot protocol" is set to None, which might allow remote attackers to communicate with a system designated to be unreachable. Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager 3.6 y anteriores entrega direcciones SLAAC IPv6 válidas a interfaces cuando "boot protocol" se establece como None. Esto podría permitir que atacantes remotos se comuniquen con un sistema diseñado para ser inalcanzable. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5293 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267714 • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 19EXPL: 1CVE-2015-7501 – apache-commons-collections: InvokerTransformer code execution during deserialisation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-7501
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x y 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x y 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x y 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x y Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 permiten que atacantes remotos ejecuten comandos arbitrarios mediante un objeto Java serializado manipulado. Esto está relacionado con la librería ACC (Apache Commons Collections). It was found that the Apache commons-collections library permitted code execution when deserializing objects involving a specially constructed chain of classes. A remote attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the application using the commons-collections library. • https://github.com/ianxtianxt/CVE-2015-7501 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2500.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2501.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2502.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2514.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2516.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2517.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2521.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2522.html http://rhn.redhat. • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •