CVSS: 5.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2023-2455 – postgresql: row security policies disregard user ID changes after inlining.
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-2455
Row security policies disregard user ID changes after inlining; PostgreSQL could permit incorrect policies to be applied in certain cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. A flaw was found in PostgreSQL, which could permit incorrect policies being applied in certain cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and executed under other roles. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-2455 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230706-0006 https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2023-2455 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207569 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2023-2454 – postgresql: schema_element defeats protective search_path changes
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-2454
schema_element defeats protective search_path changes; It was found that certain database calls in PostgreSQL could permit an authed attacker with elevated database-level privileges to execute arbitrary code. A flaw was found in PostgreSQL. Certain database calls could permit an attacker with elevated database-level privileges to execute arbitrary code. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-2454 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230706-0006 https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2023-2454 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207568 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 1CVE-2022-4904 – c-ares: buffer overflow in config_sortlist() due to missing string length check
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-4904
A flaw was found in the c-ares package. The ares_set_sortlist is missing checks about the validity of the input string, which allows a possible arbitrary length stack overflow. This issue may cause a denial of service or a limited impact on confidentiality and integrity. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168631 https://github.com/c-ares/c-ares/issues/496 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/33LDNS6RPOPP36Z4MPWXALUQZXJCWJS2 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202401-02 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4904 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-1284: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2023-0056 – haproxy: segfault DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-0056
An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability was discovered in HAProxy which could crash the service. This issue could allow an authenticated remote attacker to run a specially crafted malicious server in an OpenShift cluster. The biggest impact is to availability. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-0056 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160808 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0CVE-2020-10735 – python: int() type in PyLong_FromString() does not limit amount of digits converting text to int leading to DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-10735
A flaw was found in python. In algorithms with quadratic time complexity using non-binary bases, when using int("text"), a system could take 50ms to parse an int string with 100,000 digits and 5s for 1,000,000 digits (float, decimal, int.from_bytes(), and int() for binary bases 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 are not affected). The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se ha encontrado un fallo en python. En los algoritmos con complejidad de tiempo cuadrática que usan bases no binarias, cuando es usada int("text"), un sistema podría tardar 50ms en analizar una cadena int con 100.000 dígitos y 5s para 1.000.000 de dígitos (float, decimal, int.from_bytes(), e int() para bases binarias 2, 4, 8, 16, y 32 no están afectados). • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/21/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/21/4 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-10735 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834423 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KjuF_aXlzPUxTK4BMgezGJ2Pn7uevfX7g0_mvgHlL7Y https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/95778 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00039.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fed • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast •