CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2019-3879
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-3879
It was discovered that in the ovirt's REST API before version 4.3.2.1, RemoveDiskCommand is triggered as an internal command, meaning the permission validation that should be performed against the calling user is skipped. A user with low privileges (eg Basic Operations) could exploit this flaw to delete disks attached to guests. Se ha observado que en la API REST de ovirt, en versiones anteriores a la 4.3.2.1, RemoveDiskCommand se activa como un comando interno, haciendo que se omita la validación del permiso que se debería ejecutar en el usuario que hace la llamada. Un usuario con bajos privilegios (p. ej., Basic Operations) podría explotar este error para eliminar discos conectados a invitados. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107561 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0802 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3879 • CWE-862: Missing Authorization •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1114 – undertow: File descriptor leak caused by JarURLConnection.getLastModified() allows attacker to cause a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1114
It was found that URLResource.getLastModified() in Undertow closes the file descriptors only when they are finalized which can cause file descriptors to exhaust. This leads to a file handler leak. Se ha detectado que URLResource.getLastModified() en Undertow cierra los descriptores de archivo solo cuando están finalizados, lo que puede provocar el agotamiento de dichos descriptores. Esto conduce a una fuga del manejador de archivos. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2643 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6956385 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1114 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-1338 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-1114 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573045 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1072 – ovirt-engine-setup: unfiltered db password in engine-backup log
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1072
ovirt-engine before version ovirt 4.2.2 is vulnerable to an information exposure through log files. When engine-backup was run with one of the options "--provision*db", the database username and password were logged in cleartext. Sharing the provisioning log might inadvertently leak database passwords. ovirt-engine en versiones anteriores a ovirt 4.2.2 es vulnerable a una exposición de información mediante archivos de log. Cuando engine-backup se ejecutaba con una de las opciones "--provision*db", el nombre de usuario y la contraseña de la base de la base de datos se registraban en texto claro. Compartir el log de aprovisionamiento podía fugar de manera inadvertida contraseñas de la base de datos. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2071 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1072 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-1072 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553522 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540622 • CWE-532: Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1000180 – bouncycastle: flaw in the low-level interface to RSA key pair generator
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1000180
Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later. Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 y anteriores tiene un vulnerabilidad en la interfaz de bajo nivel del generador de claves RSA; específicamente, los pares de claves RSA generados en la API de bajo nivel con un valor certainty añadido pueden tener menos tests M-R de lo esperado. Parece que se ha resuelto en versiones BC 1.60 beta 4 y posteriores y BC-FJA 1.0.2 y posteriores. A vulnerability was found in BouncyCastle. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106567 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2423 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2424 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2425 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2428 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2643 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877 https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/22467b6e8fe19717ecdf201c0cf91bacf04a55ad https://github.com/bcgit/ • CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •