CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2018-17958 – QEMU: rtl8139: integer overflow leads to buffer overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-17958
Qemu has a Buffer Overflow in rtl8139_do_receive in hw/net/rtl8139.c because an incorrect integer data type is used. Qemu tiene un desbordamiento de búfer en rtl8139_do_receive en hw/net/rtl8139.c debido a que se emplea un tipo de datos de enteros incorrecto. An integer overflow issue was found in the RTL8139 NIC emulation in QEMU. It could occur while receiving packets over the network if the size value is greater than INT_MAX. Such overflow would lead to stack buffer overflow issue. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/10/08/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105556 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2425 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2553 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/01/msg00023.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg03269.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/76 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3826-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4454 https://access& • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2018-17963 – QEMU: net: ignore packets with large size
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-17963
qemu_deliver_packet_iov in net/net.c in Qemu accepts packet sizes greater than INT_MAX, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact. qemu_deliver_packet_iov en net/net.c en Qemu acepta tamaños de paquetes mayores a INT_MAX, lo que permite que los atacantes provoquen una denegación de servicio (DoS) o tengan otro tipo de impacto sin especificar. A potential integer overflow issue was found in the networking back-end of QEMU. It could occur while receiving packets, because it accepted packets with large size value. Such overflow could lead to OOB buffer access issue. A user inside guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process resulting in DoS. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/10/08/1 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2166 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2425 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2553 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00038.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg03267.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-11/msg06054.html https://usn.ubuntu.com/3826-1 https://www.debian.org/securi • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 4.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5709
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5709
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager 6.3.1 and earlier uses weak encryption to store passwords in /etc/shadow, which allows local users with superuser privileges to obtain user passwords via a brute force attack. SolarWinds Virtualization Manager 6.3.1 y versiones anteriores, utiliza un cifrado débil para almacenar contraseñas en /etc/shadow, lo que permite a usuarios locales con privilegios de superusuario obtener contraseñas de usuarios a través de un ataque de fuerza bruta. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/137525/Solarwinds-Virtualization-Manager-6.3.1-Weak-Crypto.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Jun/38 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1CVE-2016-3642 – Solarwinds Virtualization Manager 6.3.1 Java Deserialization
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3642
The RMI service in SolarWinds Virtualization Manager 6.3.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. El servicio RMI en SolarWinds Virtualization Manager 6.3.1 y versiones anteriores permite a atacantes ejecutar comandos arbitrarios a través de un objeto Java serializado manipulado, relacionado con la librería Apache Commons Collections (ACC). Solarwinds Virtualization Manager versions 6.3.1 and below suffer from a java deserialization vulnerability. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/137486/Solarwinds-Virtualization-Manager-6.3.1-Java-Deserialization.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Jun/25 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Jun/29 •