Page 2 of 11 results (0.035 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (All versions < V7.2), RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M804PB (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router (Annex A) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router (Annex B) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router (Annex A) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router (Annex B) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-Router (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M874-2 (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M874-3 (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M876-3 (EVDO) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (EU) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (NAM) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW) (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE S615 (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE S615 EEC (All versions < V7.2), SCALANCE SC622-2C (All versions < V2.3), SCALANCE SC622-2C (All versions >= V2.3 < V3.0), SCALANCE SC626-2C (All versions < V2.3), SCALANCE SC626-2C (All versions >= V2.3 < V3.0), SCALANCE SC632-2C (All versions < V2.3), SCALANCE SC632-2C (All versions >= V2.3 < V3.0), SCALANCE SC636-2C (All versions < V2.3), SCALANCE SC636-2C (All versions >= V2.3 < V3.0), SCALANCE SC642-2C (All versions < V2.3), SCALANCE SC642-2C (All versions >= V2.3 < V3.0), SCALANCE SC646-2C (All versions < V2.3), SCALANCE SC646-2C (All versions >= V2.3 < V3.0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (All versions), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (EU) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (EU) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (All versions), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (All versions), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (All versions), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (EU) (All versions), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (US) (All versions), SIMATIC CP 1242-7 V2 (All versions < V3.3.46), SIMATIC CP 1243-1 (All versions < V3.3.46), SIMATIC CP 1243-7 LTE EU (All versions < V3.3.46), SIMATIC CP 1243-7 LTE US (All versions < V3.3.46), SIMATIC CP 1243-8 IRC (All versions < V3.3.46), SIMATIC CP 1542SP-1 IRC (All versions >= V2.0 < V2.2.28), SIMATIC CP 1543-1 (All versions < V3.0.22), SIMATIC CP 1543SP-1 (All versions >= V2.0 < V2.2.28), SIPLUS ET 200SP CP 1542SP-1 IRC TX RAIL (All versions >= V2.0 < V2.2.28), SIPLUS ET 200SP CP 1543SP-1 ISEC (All versions >= V2.0 < V2.2.28), SIPLUS ET 200SP CP 1543SP-1 ISEC TX RAIL (All versions >= V2.0 < V2.2.28), SIPLUS NET CP 1242-7 V2 (All versions < V3.3.46), SIPLUS NET CP 1543-1 (All versions < V3.0.22), SIPLUS S7-1200 CP 1243-1 (All versions < V3.3.46), SIPLUS S7-1200 CP 1243-1 RAIL (All versions < V3.3.46). By injecting code to specific configuration options for OpenVPN, an attacker could execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. Se ha identificado una vulnerabilidad en SIMATIC CP 1242-7 V2 (Todas las versiones anteriores a V3.3.46), SIMATIC CP 1243-1 (Todas las versiones anteriores a V3.3.46), SIMATIC CP 1243-7 LTE EU (Todas las versiones anteriores a V3.3.46), SIMATIC CP 1243-7 LTE US (Todas las versiones anteriores a V3. 3.46), SIMATIC CP 1243-8 IRC (Todas las versiones anteriores a V3.3.46), SIMATIC CP 1542SP-1 IRC (Todas las versiones posteriores o iguales a V2.0), SIMATIC CP 1543-1 (Todas las versiones anteriores a V3.0.22), SIMATIC CP 1543SP-1 (Todas las versiones posteriores o iguales a V2. 0), SIPLUS ET 200SP CP 1542SP-1 IRC TX RAIL (Todas las versiones posteriores o iguales a V2.0), SIPLUS ET 200SP CP 1543SP-1 ISEC (Todas las versiones posteriores o iguales a V2.0), SIPLUS ET 200SP CP 1543SP-1 ISEC TX RAIL (Todas las versiones posteriores o iguales a V2. 0), SIPLUS NET CP 1242-7 V2 (Todas las versiones anteriores a V3.3.46), SIPLUS NET CP 1543-1 (Todas las versiones anteriores a V3.0.22), SIPLUS S7-1200 CP 1243-1 (Todas las versiones anteriores a V3.3.46), SIPLUS S7-1200 CP 1243-1 RAIL (Todas las versiones anteriores a V3.3.46). Al inyectar código a opciones de configuración específicas para OpenVPN, un atacante podría ejecutar código arbitrario con privilegios elevados • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-413565.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-517377.pdf • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 8%CPEs: 50EXPL: 0

The in-memory certificate cache in strongSwan before 5.9.4 has a remote integer overflow upon receiving many requests with different certificates to fill the cache and later trigger the replacement of cache entries. The code attempts to select a less-often-used cache entry by means of a random number generator, but this is not done correctly. Remote code execution might be a slight possibility. La caché de certificados en memoria en strongSwan versiones anteriores a 5.9.4, presenta un desbordamiento de enteros remoto al recibir muchas peticiones con diferentes certificados para llenar la caché y posteriormente desencadenar la sustitución de las entradas de la caché. El código intenta seleccionar una entrada de caché menos usada mediante un generador de números aleatorios, pero esto no es realizado correctamente. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-539476.pdf https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/releases/tag/5.9.4 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/10/msg00014.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5FJSATD2R2XHTG4P63GCMQ2N7EWKMME5 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WQSQ3BEC22NF4NCDZVCT4P3Q2ZIAJXGJ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/mes • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 205EXPL: 0

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-772220.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fb9fa6b51defd48157eeb207f52181f735d96148 https://kb.pulse • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in multiple versions of OpenvSwitch. Specially crafted LLDP packets can cause memory to be lost when allocating data to handle specific optional TLVs, potentially causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se encontró un fallo en múltiples versiones de OpenvSwitch.&#xa0;Los paquetes LLDP especialmente diseñados pueden causar que una memoria se pierda cuando se asignan datos para manejar TLV opcionales específicos, potencialmente causando una denegación de servicio. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921438 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-941426.pdf https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3T5XHPOGIPWCRRPJUE6P3HVC5PTSD5JS https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JYA4AMJXCNF6UPFG36L2TPPT32C242SP https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SKQWHG2SZJZSGC7PXVDAEJYBN7ESDR7D https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2021&# • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 152EXPL: 0

The Linux kernel, versions 3.9+, is vulnerable to a denial of service attack with low rates of specially modified packets targeting IP fragment re-assembly. An attacker may cause a denial of service condition by sending specially crafted IP fragments. Various vulnerabilities in IP fragmentation have been discovered and fixed over the years. The current vulnerability (CVE-2018-5391) became exploitable in the Linux kernel with the increase of the IP fragment reassembly queue size. El kernel de Linux en versiones a partir de la 3.9 es vulnerable a un ataque de denegación de servicio (DoS) con tasas bajas de paquetes especialmente modificados que apuntan hacia el reensamblado de fragmentos de IP. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20200115-01-linux-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105108 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041476 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041637 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •