CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 3CVE-2019-8331 – bootstrap: XSS in the tooltip or popover data-template attribute
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-8331
In Bootstrap before 3.4.1 and 4.3.x before 4.3.1, XSS is possible in the tooltip or popover data-template attribute. En Bootstrap, en versiones anteriores a la 3.4.1 y versiones 4.3.x anteriores a la 4.3.1, es posible Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) en los atributos de data-template tooltip o popover. A cross-site scripting vulnerability was discovered in bootstrap. If an attacker could control the data given to tooltip or popover, they could inject HTML or Javascript into the rendered page when tooltip or popover events fired. • https://github.com/Thampakon/CVE-2019-8331 https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2019-8331 https://github.com/Snorlyd/https-nj.gov---CVE-2019-8331 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/156743/OctoberCMS-Insecure-Dependencies.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/10 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/11 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/13 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107375 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1456 https://access.re • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16881 – rsyslog: imptcp: integer overflow when Octet-Counted TCP Framing is enabled
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16881
A denial of service vulnerability was found in rsyslog in the imptcp module. An attacker could send a specially crafted message to the imptcp socket, which would cause rsyslog to crash. Versions before 8.27.0 are vulnerable. Se ha detectado una vulnerabilidad de denegación de servicio (DoS) en rsyslog en el módulo imptcp. Un atacante podría enviar un mensaje especialmente manipulado al socket imptcp, lo que conduciría al cierre forzado de rsyslog. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2501 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2110 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2437 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2439 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16881 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00028.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-16881 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658366 • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2018-17958 – QEMU: rtl8139: integer overflow leads to buffer overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-17958
Qemu has a Buffer Overflow in rtl8139_do_receive in hw/net/rtl8139.c because an incorrect integer data type is used. Qemu tiene un desbordamiento de búfer en rtl8139_do_receive en hw/net/rtl8139.c debido a que se emplea un tipo de datos de enteros incorrecto. An integer overflow issue was found in the RTL8139 NIC emulation in QEMU. It could occur while receiving packets over the network if the size value is greater than INT_MAX. Such overflow would lead to stack buffer overflow issue. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/10/08/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105556 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2425 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2553 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/01/msg00023.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg03269.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/76 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3826-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4454 https://access& • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2018-17963 – QEMU: net: ignore packets with large size
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-17963
qemu_deliver_packet_iov in net/net.c in Qemu accepts packet sizes greater than INT_MAX, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact. qemu_deliver_packet_iov en net/net.c en Qemu acepta tamaños de paquetes mayores a INT_MAX, lo que permite que los atacantes provoquen una denegación de servicio (DoS) o tengan otro tipo de impacto sin especificar. A potential integer overflow issue was found in the networking back-end of QEMU. It could occur while receiving packets, because it accepted packets with large size value. Such overflow could lead to OOB buffer access issue. A user inside guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process resulting in DoS. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/10/08/1 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2166 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2425 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2553 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00038.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg03267.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-11/msg06054.html https://usn.ubuntu.com/3826-1 https://www.debian.org/securi • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •