CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2022-4450 – Double free after calling PEM_read_bio_ex
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-4450
The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. • https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=63bcf189be73a9cc1264059bed6f57974be74a83 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=bbcf509bd046b34cca19c766bbddc31683d0858b https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4450 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164494 • CWE-415: Double Free •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2023-0286 – X.400 address type confusion in X.509 GeneralName
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-0286
There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. • https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.6.2-relnotes.txt https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.2/common/018_x509.patch.sig https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2c6c9d439b484e1ba9830d8454a34fa4f80fdfe9 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2f7530077e0ef79d98718138716bc51ca0cad658 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd2af07dc083a350c959147097003a14a5e8ac4d https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08 https://www.open • CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2022-4304 – Timing Oracle in RSA Decryption
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-4304
A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection. • https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4304 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164487 • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2022-40617
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-40617
strongSwan before 5.9.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service in the revocation plugin by sending a crafted end-entity (and intermediate CA) certificate that contains a CRL/OCSP URL that points to a server (under the attacker's control) that doesn't properly respond but (for example) just does nothing after the initial TCP handshake, or sends an excessive amount of application data. strongSwan anterior a 5.9.8 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una Denegación de Servicio en el complemento de revocación enviando un certificado de entidad final (y CA intermedia) manipulado que contiene una URL CRL/OCSP que apunta a un servidor (bajo el control del atacante) que no responde adecuadamente pero (por ejemplo) simplemente no hace nada después del protocolo de enlace TCP inicial o envía una cantidad excesiva de datos de la aplicación. • https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/J3GAYIOCSLU57C45CO4UE4IV4JZE4W3L https://www.strongswan.org/blog/2022/10/03/strongswan-vulnerability-%28cve-2022-40617%29.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 4CVE-2022-37434 – zlib: heap-based buffer over-read and overflow in inflate() in inflate.c via a large gzip header extra field
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-37434
zlib through 1.2.12 has a heap-based buffer over-read or buffer overflow in inflate in inflate.c via a large gzip header extra field. NOTE: only applications that call inflateGetHeader are affected. Some common applications bundle the affected zlib source code but may be unable to call inflateGetHeader (e.g., see the nodejs/node reference). zlib versiones hasta 1.2.12, presenta una lectura excesiva de búfer en la región heap de la memoria o desbordamiento de búfer en el archivo inflate.c por medio de un campo extra del encabezado gzip. NOTA: sólo están afectadas las aplicaciones que llaman a inflateGetHeader. Algunas aplicaciones comunes agrupan el código fuente de zlib afectado pero pueden ser incapaces de llamar a inflateGetHeader (por ejemplo, véase la referencia nodejs/node) A security vulnerability was found in zlib. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/37 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/38 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/41 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/42 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/08/05/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/08/09/1 https://github.com/curl/curl/issues/9271 https://github.com/ivd38/zlib_overflow https://github.com/madler/zlib/blob/21767c654d31d2dccdde4330529775c6c5fd5389/zlib.h#L1062-L1063 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •