Page 2 of 23 results (0.007 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0 and 8.14.0: HTTP request splitting: If Node.js can be convinced to use unsanitized user-provided Unicode data for the `path` option of an HTTP request, then data can be provided which will trigger a second, unexpected, and user-defined HTTP request to made to the same server. Node.js: Todas las versiones anteriores a la 6.15.0 y 8.14.0: separación de petición HTTP. Si se puede convencer a Node.js para que emplee datos Unicode no saneados proporcionados por el usuario para la opción "path" de una petición HTTP, los datos pueden proporcionarse para desencadenar una segunda petición HTTP no esperada y definida por el usuario para el mismo servidor. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1821 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/november-2018-security-releases https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-48 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-12116 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1660998 • CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') CWE-115: Misinterpretation of Input •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Slowloris HTTP Denial of Service: An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending headers very slowly keeping HTTP or HTTPS connections and associated resources alive for a long period of time. Node.js: Todas las versiones anteriores a la 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 y 11.3.0: Denegación de servicio (DoS) HTTP mediante Slowloris. Un atacante puede provocar una denegación de servicio (DoS) enviando cabeceras muy lentamente, manteniendo las conexiones HTTP o HTTPS y los recursos asociados vivos durante un largo período de tiempo. It was found that Node.js HTTP server was vulnerable to a Slowloris type attack. An attacker could make long lived connections by sending bytes very slowly to the server, saturating its resource and possibly resulting in a denial of service. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106043 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1821 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/november-2018-security-releases https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-48 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-12122 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661005 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in ansible. ansible.cfg is read from the current working directory which can be altered to make it point to a plugin or a module path under the control of an attacker, thus allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code. Se ha encontrado un error en ansible. ansible.cfg se lee desde el directorio de trabajo actual, que puede alterarse para hacer que señale a un plugin o una ruta de módulo bajo el control de un atacante, permitiendo que el atacante ejecute código arbitrario. It was found that ansible.cfg is being read from the current working directory, which can be made to point to plugin or module paths that are under control of the attacker. This could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00021.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041396 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3788 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2150 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2151 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2152 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2166 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2321 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2585 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-426: Untrusted Search Path •

CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 2%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

Pacemaker before 1.1.15, when using pacemaker remote, might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (node disconnection) via an unauthenticated connection. Pacemaker en versiones anteriores a 1.1.15, al usar el control remoto de marcapasos, podría permitir a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (desconexión de nodo) a través de una conexión no autenticada. It was found that the connection between a pacemaker cluster and a pacemaker_remote node could be shut down using a new unauthenticated connection. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of service. • http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5269 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-11/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-12/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00077.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2578.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/01/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93261 https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/5ec24a2642bd0854b884d1a9b51d12371373b410 htt • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 49%CPEs: 81EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; and JRockit R28.3.9 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to JMX. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99 y 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; y JRockit R28.3.9 permite a atacantes remotos afectar a la confidencialidad, integridad y disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con JMX. It was discovered that the RMI server implementation in the JMX component in OpenJDK did not restrict which classes can be deserialized when deserializing authentication credentials. A remote, unauthenticated attacker able to connect to a JMX port could possibly use this flaw to trigger deserialization flaws. Oracle Java SE and JRockit contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Java Management Extensions (JMX). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 •