CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2021-20077
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-20077
Nessus Agent versions 7.2.0 through 8.2.2 were found to inadvertently capture the IAM role security token on the local host during initial linking of the Nessus Agent when installed on an Amazon EC2 instance. This could allow a privileged attacker to obtain the token. Se encontró que las versiones 7.2.0 a 8.2.2 del Agente Nessus capturan inadvertidamente el token de seguridad del rol IAM en el host local durante la vinculación inicial del Agente Nessus cuando se instala en una instancia de Amazon EC2. Esto podría permitir a un atacante privilegiado obtener el token • https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-04-0 https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-07 •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2020-5793
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-5793
A vulnerability in Nessus versions 8.9.0 through 8.12.0 for Windows & Nessus Agent 8.0.0 and 8.1.0 for Windows could allow an authenticated local attacker to copy user-supplied files to a specially constructed path in a specifically named user directory. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious file and copying the file to a system directory. The attacker needs valid credentials on the Windows system to exploit this vulnerability. Una vulnerabilidad en Nessus versiones 8.9.0 a 8.12.0, para Windows y Nessus Agent versiones 8.0.0 y 8.1.0 para Windows, podría permitir a un atacante local autenticado copiar archivos suministrados por el usuario en una ruta especialmente construida en un directorio de usuario con nombre específico. Un atacante podría explotar esta vulnerabilidad mediante la creación de un archivo malicioso y copiar el archivo en un directorio del sistema. • https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2020-07 https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2020-08 •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16168 – sqlite: Division by zero in whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16168
In SQLite through 3.29.0, whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c can crash a browser or other application because of missing validation of a sqlite_stat1 sz field, aka a "severe division by zero in the query planner." En SQLite versiones hasta 3.29.0, la función whereLoopAddBtreeIndex en el archivo sqlite3.c puede bloquear un navegador u otra aplicación debido a la falta de comprobación de un campo sqlite_stat1 sz, también se conoce como "severe division by zero in the query planner.". • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00033.html https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00037.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XZARJHJJDBHI7CE5PZEBXS5HKK6HXKW2 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-16 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190926-0003 https:/& • CWE-369: Divide By Zero •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •