CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 34EXPL: 2CVE-2009-2267 – VMware Virtual 8086 - Linux Local Ring0
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-2267
VMware Workstation 6.5.x before 6.5.3 build 185404, VMware Player 2.5.x before 2.5.3 build 185404, VMware ACE 2.5.x before 2.5.3 build 185404, VMware Server 1.x before 1.0.10 build 203137 and 2.x before 2.0.2 build 203138, VMware Fusion 2.x before 2.0.6 build 196839, VMware ESXi 3.5 and 4.0, and VMware ESX 2.5.5, 3.0.3, 3.5, and 4.0, when Virtual-8086 mode is used, do not properly set the exception code upon a page fault (aka #PF) exception, which allows guest OS users to gain privileges on the guest OS by specifying a crafted value for the cs register. VMware Workstation v6.5.x anteriores a v6.5.3 build 185404, VMware Player v2.5.x anteriores a v2.5.3 build 185404, VMware ACE v2.5.x anteriores a v2.5.3 build 185404, VMware Server v1.x anteriores a v1.0.10 build 203137 and v2.x anteriores a v2.0.2 build 203138, VMware Fusion v2.x anteriores a v2.0.6 build 196839, VMware ESXi v3.5 y v4.0, y VMware ESX v2.5.5, v3.0.3, v3.5 y v4.0, cuando el modo Virtual-8086 es usado, no asigna adecuadamente el código de excepción para una excepción de fallo de página (también conocido como #PF), lo que permite a usuarios del SO anfitrión obtener privilegios en el SO anfitrión especificando un valor modificado para el registro cs. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10207 http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2009/000069.html http://secunia.com/advisories/37172 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-25.xml http://securitytracker.com/id?1023082 http://securitytracker.com/id?1023083 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/507523/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/507539/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36841 http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VM •
CVSS: 4.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 3CVE-2009-1630 – kernel: nfs: fix NFS v4 client handling of MAY_EXEC in nfs_permission
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-1630
The nfs_permission function in fs/nfs/dir.c in the NFS client implementation in the Linux kernel 2.6.29.3 and earlier, when atomic_open is available, does not check execute (aka EXEC or MAY_EXEC) permission bits, which allows local users to bypass permissions and execute files, as demonstrated by files on an NFSv4 fileserver. La función nfs_permission en fs/nfs/dir.c en la implementación cliente NFS en Linux kernel v2.6.29.3 y versiones anteriores, cuando atomic_open está activo, no comprueba la ejecución (también conocido como EXEC or MAY_EXEC) de permisos de bits, lo cual permite a usuarios locales evitar permisos y ejecutar ficheros, como lo demostrado por ficheros en un servidor de ficheros NFSv4. • http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/26592 http://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131 http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/2006-November/005313.html http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/2006-November/005323.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-07/msg00004.html http://secunia.com/advisories/35106 http://secunia.com/advisories/35298 http://secunia.com/advisories/35394 http&# • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 358EXPL: 1CVE-2009-0778 – kernel: rt_cache leak leads to lack of network connectivity
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-0778
The icmp_send function in net/ipv4/icmp.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.25, when configured as a router with a REJECT route, does not properly manage the Protocol Independent Destination Cache (aka DST) in some situations involving transmission of an ICMP Host Unreachable message, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connectivity outage) by sending a large series of packets to many destination IP addresses within this REJECT route, related to an "rt_cache leak." La función icmp_send en net/ipv4/icmp.c en el kernel Linux anerior a v2.6.25, cuando se configura como un router con una ruta RECHAZADA, no gestiona apropiadamente el Protocolo Independiente de Caché de Destino (alias DST) en alguna situación que involucra transmisión de un mensaje ICMP Host inalcanzable, el cual permite a los atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (conectividad parada) enviando una larga serie de paquetes a muchos direcciones IP de destino con esta ruta RECHAZADA, RELATIVA a "rt_cache leak." • http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=7c0ecc4c4f8fd90988aab8a95297b9c0038b6160 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/03/11/2 http://secunia.com/advisories/33758 http://secunia.com/advisories/37471 http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.25 http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0326.html http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/507985/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34084 http:/&#x • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2008-4915
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-4915
The CPU hardware emulation in VMware Workstation 6.0.5 and earlier and 5.5.8 and earlier; Player 2.0.x through 2.0.5 and 1.0.x through 1.0.8; ACE 2.0.x through 2.0.5 and earlier, and 1.0.x through 1.0.7; Server 1.0.x through 1.0.7; ESX 2.5.4 through 3.5; and ESXi 3.5, when running 32-bit and 64-bit guest operating systems, does not properly handle the Trap flag, which allows authenticated guest OS users to gain privileges on the guest OS. Una vulnerabilidad sin especificar en la emulación de hardware de CPU en sistemas operativos internos de 32-bit y 64-bit, en VMware Workstation v6.0.5 y anteriores; Player v2.0.x a la v2.0.5 y v1.0.x a la v1.0.8; ACE v2.0.x a la v2.0.5 y anteriores, y v1.0.x a la v1.0.7; Server v1.0.x a la v1.0.7; ESX v2.5.4 a la v3.5; y ESXi v3.5; no maneja de forma adecuada el flag Trap, que permite a usuarios del sistema operativo (SO) huésped obtener privilegios en el SO huésped. • http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2008/000042.html http://secunia.com/advisories/32612 http://secunia.com/advisories/32624 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-25.xml http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/498138/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32168 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021154 http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2008-0018.html http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/3052 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2008-4281
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-4281
Directory traversal vulnerability in VMWare ESXi 3.5 before ESXe350-200810401-O-UG and ESX 3.5 before ESX350-200810201-UG allows administrators with the Datastore.FileManagement privilege to gain privileges via unknown vectors. Vulnerabilidad de salto de directorio en VMWare ESXi 3.5 anterior a ESXe350-200810401-O-UG y ESX 3.5 anterior a ESX350-200810201-UG; permite a los administradores con el privilegio Datastore.FileManagement, ganar privilegios a través de vectores desconocidos. • http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2008/000042.html http://secunia.com/advisories/32624 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/498138/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32172 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021155 http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2008-0018.html http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/3052 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46418 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.ov • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •