CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 145EXPL: 1CVE-2023-20593 – hw: amd: Cross-Process Information Leak
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-20593
An issue in “Zen 2” CPUs, under specific microarchitectural circumstances, may allow an attacker to potentially access sensitive information. A flaw was found in hw, in “Zen 2” CPUs. This issue may allow an attacker to access sensitive information under specific microarchitectural circumstances. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jul/43 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/24/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/25/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/25/12 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/25/13 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/25/14 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/25/15 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/25/1 • CWE-1239: Improper Zeroization of Hardware Register •
CVSS: 3.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2022-42336
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-42336
Mishandling of guest SSBD selection on AMD hardware The current logic to set SSBD on AMD Family 17h and Hygon Family 18h processors requires that the setting of SSBD is coordinated at a core level, as the setting is shared between threads. Logic was introduced to keep track of how many threads require SSBD active in order to coordinate it, such logic relies on using a per-core counter of threads that have SSBD active. When running on the mentioned hardware, it's possible for a guest to under or overflow the thread counter, because each write to VIRT_SPEC_CTRL.SSBD by the guest gets propagated to the helper that does the per-core active accounting. Underflowing the counter causes the value to get saturated, and thus attempts for guests running on the same core to set SSBD won't have effect because the hypervisor assumes it's already active. • https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LTO3U3WYLAZW3KLPKJZ332FYUREXPZMQ https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-431.txt •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2022-42335
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-42335
x86 shadow paging arbitrary pointer dereference In environments where host assisted address translation is necessary but Hardware Assisted Paging (HAP) is unavailable, Xen will run guests in so called shadow mode. Due to too lax a check in one of the hypervisor routines used for shadow page handling it is possible for a guest with a PCI device passed through to cause the hypervisor to access an arbitrary pointer partially under guest control. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/04/25/1 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-430.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PSPFWSY6UOPGMADQGOGN2PAAS5LJRPTG https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-430.txt • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2022-42331
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-42331
x86: speculative vulnerability in 32bit SYSCALL path Due to an oversight in the very original Spectre/Meltdown security work (XSA-254), one entrypath performs its speculation-safety actions too late. In some configurations, there is an unprotected RET instruction which can be attacked with a variety of speculative attacks. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/03/21/3 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-429.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5L6PM4RE7MUE6OWA32ZVOXCP235RM2TM https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APBMS2Q6746AXAFAITNJMGBNFGNMVLWR https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5378 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-429.txt •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2022-42334
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-42334
x86/HVM pinned cache attributes mis-handling T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] To allow cachability control for HVM guests with passed through devices, an interface exists to explicitly override defaults which would otherwise be put in place. While not exposed to the affected guests themselves, the interface specifically exists for domains controlling such guests. This interface may therefore be used by not fully privileged entities, e.g. qemu running deprivileged in Dom0 or qemu running in a so called stub-domain. With this exposure it is an issue that - the number of the such controlled regions was unbounded (CVE-2022-42333), - installation and removal of such regions was not properly serialized (CVE-2022-42334). • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/03/21/2 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-428.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5L6PM4RE7MUE6OWA32ZVOXCP235RM2TM https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APBMS2Q6746AXAFAITNJMGBNFGNMVLWR https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5378 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-428.txt • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •