CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2022-42331
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-42331
x86: speculative vulnerability in 32bit SYSCALL path Due to an oversight in the very original Spectre/Meltdown security work (XSA-254), one entrypath performs its speculation-safety actions too late. In some configurations, there is an unprotected RET instruction which can be attacked with a variety of speculative attacks. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/03/21/3 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-429.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5L6PM4RE7MUE6OWA32ZVOXCP235RM2TM https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APBMS2Q6746AXAFAITNJMGBNFGNMVLWR https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5378 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-429.txt •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2022-26356
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-26356
Racy interactions between dirty vram tracking and paging log dirty hypercalls Activation of log dirty mode done by XEN_DMOP_track_dirty_vram (was named HVMOP_track_dirty_vram before Xen 4.9) is racy with ongoing log dirty hypercalls. A suitably timed call to XEN_DMOP_track_dirty_vram can enable log dirty while another CPU is still in the process of tearing down the structures related to a previously enabled log dirty mode (XEN_DOMCTL_SHADOW_OP_OFF). This is due to lack of mutually exclusive locking between both operations and can lead to entries being added in already freed slots, resulting in a memory leak. Una activación del modo de registro sucio realizada por XEN_DMOP_track_dirty_vram (es llamada HVMOP_track_dirty_vram antes de Xen versión 4.9) es producido con las hiperllamadas de registro sucio en curso. Una llamada a XEN_DMOP_track_dirty_vram con el tiempo apropiado puede habilitar log dirty mientras otra CPU está todavía en el proceso de desmontar las estructuras relacionadas con un modo log dirty previamente habilitado (XEN_DOMCTL_SHADOW_OP_OFF). • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/05/1 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-397.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6ETPM2OVZZ6KOS2L7QO7SIW6XWT5OW3F https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UHFSRVLM2JUCPDC2KGB7ETPQYJLCGBLD https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-397.txt • CWE-667: Improper Locking •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2022-23034
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-23034
A PV guest could DoS Xen while unmapping a grant To address XSA-380, reference counting was introduced for grant mappings for the case where a PV guest would have the IOMMU enabled. PV guests can request two forms of mappings. When both are in use for any individual mapping, unmapping of such a mapping can be requested in two steps. The reference count for such a mapping would then mistakenly be decremented twice. Underflow of the counters gets detected, resulting in the triggering of a hypervisor bug check. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/25/3 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMR6UBGJW6JKND7IILGQ2CU35EQPF3E3 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-23 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-394.txt • CWE-191: Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) •
CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2021-28703
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-28703
grant table v2 status pages may remain accessible after de-allocation (take two) Guest get permitted access to certain Xen-owned pages of memory. The majority of such pages remain allocated / associated with a guest for its entire lifetime. Grant table v2 status pages, however, get de-allocated when a guest switched (back) from v2 to v1. The freeing of such pages requires that the hypervisor know where in the guest these pages were mapped. The hypervisor tracks only one use within guest space, but racing requests from the guest to insert mappings of these pages may result in any of them to become mapped in multiple locations. • https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-387.txt •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2021-28706
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-28706
guests may exceed their designated memory limit When a guest is permitted to have close to 16TiB of memory, it may be able to issue hypercalls to increase its memory allocation beyond the administrator established limit. This is a result of a calculation done with 32-bit precision, which may overflow. It would then only be the overflowed (and hence small) number which gets compared against the established upper bound. Los huéspedes pueden exceder su límite de memoria designado Cuando a un huésped se le permite tener cerca de 16TiB de memoria, puede ser capaz de emitir hypercalls para aumentar su asignación de memoria más allá del límite establecido por el administrador. Esto es el resultado de un cálculo realizado con precisión de 32 bits, que puede desbordarse. • https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I7ZGWVVRI4XY2XSTBI3XEMWBXPDVX6OT https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PXUI4VMD52CH3T7YXAG3J2JW7ZNN3SXF https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-5017 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-385.txt • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •