Page 20 of 382 results (0.186 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

In the function wmi_set_ie(), the length validation code does not handle unsigned integer overflow properly. As a result, a large value of the 'ie_len' argument can cause a buffer overflow in all Android releases from CAF (Android for MSM, Firefox OS for MSM, QRD Android) using the Linux Kernel. En la función wmi_set_ie(), el código de validación de longitud no gestiona correctamente los desbordamientos de enteros sin firmar. Como resultado, un gran valor del argumento "ie_len" puede provocar un desbordamiento de búfer en todas las distribuciones de Android de CAF (Android for MSM, Firefox OS for MSM, QRD Android) que utilizan el kernel de Linux. In the function wmi_set_ie() in the Linux kernel the length validation code does not handle unsigned integer overflow properly. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3083 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3096 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00017.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00034.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/04/msg00004.html https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2018-05-01 https://www.codeaurora.org/security-bulletin/2018/05/11/may-2018-code- • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 8.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0

m_cat in slirp/mbuf.c in Qemu has a heap-based buffer overflow via incoming fragmented datagrams. m_cat en slirp/mbuf.c en Qemu tiene un desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica (heap) mediante los datagramas entrantes fragmentados. A heap buffer overflow issue was found in the way SLiRP networking back-end in QEMU processes fragmented packets. It could occur while reassembling the fragmented datagrams of an incoming packet. A privileged user/process inside guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process resulting in DoS or potentially leverage it to execute arbitrary code on the host with privileges of the QEMU process. This vulnerability allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Qemu. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/06/07/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104400 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2462 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2762 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2822 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2887 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2892 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586245 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00010.html https://li • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 2

A flaw was found affecting the Linux kernel before version 4.17. By mmap()ing a FUSE-backed file onto a process's memory containing command line arguments (or environment strings), an attacker can cause utilities from psutils or procps (such as ps, w) or any other program which makes a read() call to the /proc/<pid>/cmdline (or /proc/<pid>/environ) files to block indefinitely (denial of service) or for some controlled time (as a synchronization primitive for other attacks). Se ha encontrado un error que afecta al kernel de Linux en versiones anteriores a la 4.17. Al realizar un mmap() sobre un archivo copiado con FUSE en la memoria de un proceso que contiene argumentos de línea de comandos (o cadenas de entorno), un atacante puede hacer que las utilidades de psutils o procps (como ps o w) o cualquier otro programa que realiza una llamada read() a los archivos /proc//cmdline (o /proc//environ) se bloqueen indefinidamente (denegación de servicio) o durante un tiempo determinado (como primitiva de sincronización para otros ataques). By mmap()ing a FUSE-backed file onto a process's memory containing command line arguments (or environment strings), an attacker can cause utilities from psutils or procps (such as ps, w) or any other program which makes a read() call to the /proc/<pid>/cmdline (or /proc/<pid>/environ) files to block indefinitely (denial of service) or for some controlled time (as a synchronization primitive for other attacks). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44806 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q2/122 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104229 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3083 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3096 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1120 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7f7ccc2ccc2e70c6054685f5e3522efa81556830 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lt • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •

CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5

Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

Linux kernel vhost since version 4.8 does not properly initialize memory in messages passed between virtual guests and the host operating system in the vhost/vhost.c:vhost_new_msg() function. This can allow local privileged users to read some kernel memory contents when reading from the /dev/vhost-net device file. El vhost del kernel de Linux desde la versión 4.8 no inicializa correctamente la memoria en los mensajes que se pasan entre invitados virtuales y el sistema operativo host en la función vhost/vhost.c:vhost_new_msg(). Esto puede permitir que usuarios con privilegios locales lean el contenido de la memoria del kernel al leer del archivo de dispositivo /dev/vhost-net. The Linux kernel does not properly initialize memory in messages passed between virtual guests and the host operating system in the vhost/vhost.c:vhost_new_msg() function. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3083 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3096 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1118 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/07/msg00020.html https://usn.ubuntu.com/3762-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3762-2 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-1118 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573699 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-665: Improper Initialization •