Page 20 of 348 results (0.014 seconds)

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 39EXPL: 1

An issue was discovered in Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC Java 1.65 and 1.66. The OpenBSDBCrypt.checkPassword utility method compared incorrect data when checking the password, allowing incorrect passwords to indicate they were matching with previously hashed ones that were different. Se detectó un problema en Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC Java versiones 1.65 y 1.66. El método de la utilidad OpenBSDBCrypt.checkPassword comparó datos incorrectos al comprobar la contraseña, permitiendo a unas contraseñas incorrectas indicar que coinciden con otras previamente en hash que eran diferentes A flaw was found in bouncycastle. The OpenBSDBCrypt.checkPassword utility method compared incorrect data when checking the password allowing incorrect passwords to indicate they were matching with previously hashed ones that were different. • https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE-2020-28052 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r167dbc42ef7c59802c2ca1ac14735ef9cf687c25208229993d6206fe%40%3Cissues.karaf.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r175f5a25d100dbe2b1bd3459b3ce882a84c3ff91b120ed4ff2d57b53%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r25d53acd06f29244b8a103781b0339c5e7efee9099a4d52f0c230e4a%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2ddabd06d94b60cfb0141e4abb23201c628ab925e30742f61a04d013%40%3Cissues.karaf.apache.org%3E https://list • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •

CVSS: 3.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 23EXPL: 1

A temp directory creation vulnerability exists in all versions of Guava, allowing an attacker with access to the machine to potentially access data in a temporary directory created by the Guava API com.google.common.io.Files.createTempDir(). By default, on unix-like systems, the created directory is world-readable (readable by an attacker with access to the system). The method in question has been marked @Deprecated in versions 30.0 and later and should not be used. For Android developers, we recommend choosing a temporary directory API provided by Android, such as context.getCacheDir(). For other Java developers, we recommend migrating to the Java 7 API java.nio.file.Files.createTempDirectory() which explicitly configures permissions of 700, or configuring the Java runtime's java.io.tmpdir system property to point to a location whose permissions are appropriately configured. • https://github.com/google/guava/commit/fec0dbc4634006a6162cfd4d0d09c962073ddf40 https://github.com/google/guava/issues/4011 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r007add131977f4f576c232b25e024249a3d16f66aad14a4b52819d21%40%3Ccommon-issues.hadoop.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r07ed3e4417ad043a27bee7bb33322e9bfc7d7e6d1719b8e3dfd95c14%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r161b87f8037bbaff400194a63cd2016c9a69f5949f06dcc79beeab54%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r215b3d50f56faeb2f9383505f3e62faa9f549bb • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-378: Creation of Temporary File With Insecure Permissions CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 72EXPL: 0

A malicious server can use the FTP PASV response to trick curl 7.73.0 and earlier into connecting back to a given IP address and port, and this way potentially make curl extract information about services that are otherwise private and not disclosed, for example doing port scanning and service banner extractions. Un servidor malicioso puede usar la respuesta FTP PASV para engañar a curl versiones 7.73.0 y anteriores, para que se conecte de nuevo a una dirección IP y puerto determinados, y de esta manera potencialmente hacer que curl extraiga información sobre servicios que de otro modo serían privados y no divulgados, por ejemplo, haciendo escaneo de puerto y extracciones del banner de servicio A malicious server can use the `PASV` response to trick curl into connecting back to a given IP address and port, and this way potentially make curl extract information about services that are otherwise private and not disclosed, for example doing port scanning and service banner extractions. If curl operates on a URL provided by a user, a user can exploit that and pass in a URL to a malicious FTP server instance without needing any server breach to perform the attack. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2020-8284.html https://hackerone.com/reports/1040166 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00029.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DAEHE2S2QLO4AO4MEEYL75NB7SAH5PSL https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NZUVSQHN2ESHMJXNQ2Z7T2EELBB5HJXG https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202012-14 https://securi • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 62EXPL: 1

curl 7.21.0 to and including 7.73.0 is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion due to a stack overflow issue in FTP wildcard match parsing. curl versiones 7.21.0 hasta 7.73.0 e incluyéndola, es vulnerable a una recursividad no controlada debido a un problema de desbordamiento de la pila en el análisis de coincidencias del comodín FTP Libcurl offers a wildcard matching functionality, which allows a callback (set with `CURLOPT_CHUNK_BGN_FUNCTION`) to return information back to libcurl on how to handle a specific entry in a directory when libcurl iterates over a list of all available entries. When this callback returns `CURL_CHUNK_BGN_FUNC_SKIP`, to tell libcurl to not deal with that file, the internal function in libcurl then calls itself recursively to handle the next directory entry. If there's a sufficient amount of file entries and if the callback returns "skip" enough number of times, libcurl runs out of stack space. The exact amount will of course vary with platforms, compilers and other environmental factors. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Apr/51 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2020-8285.html https://github.com/curl/curl/issues/6255 https://hackerone.com/reports/1045844 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 40EXPL: 1

curl 7.41.0 through 7.73.0 is vulnerable to an improper check for certificate revocation due to insufficient verification of the OCSP response. curl versiones 7.41.0 hasta 7.73.0, es vulnerable a una comprobación inapropiada para la revocación del certificado debido a una verificación insuficiente de la respuesta OCSP Libcurl offers "OCSP stapling" via the CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYSTATUS option. When set, libcurl verifies the OCSP response that a server responds with as part of the TLS handshake. It then aborts the TLS negotiation if something is wrong with the response. The same feature can be enabled with --cert-status using the curl tool. As part of the OCSP response verification, a client should verify that the response is indeed set out for the correct certificate. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Apr/50 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Apr/51 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Apr/54 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-200951.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2020-8286.html https://hackerone.com/reports/1048457 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00029.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fe • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •