Page 20 of 206 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

CVE-2010-2249 – libpng: Memory leak when processing Physical Scale (sCAL) images

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-2249

Memory leak in pngrutil.c in libpng before 1.2.44, and 1.4.x before 1.4.3, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and application crash) via a PNG image containing malformed Physical Scale (aka sCAL) chunks. Fuga de memoria en pngrutil.c en libpng anteriores a v1.2.44 y v1.4.x anteriores a v.1.4.3, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria y caída de aplicación) a través de una imagen que contiene un troceado mal formado del Physical Scale (también conocido como sCAL) • http://libpng.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=libpng/libpng%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=90cfcecc09febb8d6c8c1d37ea7bb7cf0f4b00f3#patch20 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//Nov/msg00000.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//Nov/msg00003.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2011//Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2011/Mar/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-July/044283.html http&# • CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

CVE-2010-2067

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-2067

Stack-based buffer overflow in the TIFFFetchSubjectDistance function in tif_dirread.c in LibTIFF before 3.9.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long EXIF SubjectDistance field in a TIFF file. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila en la función TIFFFetchSubjectDistance en tif_dirread.c en LibTIFF anterior v3.9.4 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída aplicación)o probablemente ejecutar código de su elección a través de un campo SubjectDistance largo en un fichero TIFF. • http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2212 http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=874 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127731610612908&w=2 http://osvdb.org/65676 http://secunia.com/advisories/40241 http://secunia.com/advisories/40381 http://secunia.com/advisories/50726 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-02.xml http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l= • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 5EXPL: 1

CVE-2010-2063 – Samba 3.3.12 (Linux x86) - 'chain_reply' Memory Corruption

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-2063

Buffer overflow in the SMB1 packet chaining implementation in the chain_reply function in process.c in smbd in Samba 3.0.x before 3.3.13 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted field in a packet. Desbordamiento de búfer en la implementación del paquete SMB1 en la función chain_reply en process.c en smbd en Samba v3.0.x anterior v3.3.13 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (corrupción de memoria o caída de demonio) o probablemente ejecutar código de su elección a través de un campo manipulado en un paquete. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/16860 http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=873 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//Aug/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=129138831608422&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=130835366526620&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=samba-announce&m=127668712312761&w=2 http://osvdb.org/65518 http://secunia.com/advisories/ • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 6%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0

CVE-2010-0395 – openoffice.org Execution of Python code when browsing macros

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-0395

OpenOffice.org 2.x and 3.0 before 3.2.1 allows user-assisted remote attackers to bypass Python macro security restrictions and execute arbitrary Python code via a crafted OpenDocument Text (ODT) file that triggers code execution when the macro directory structure is previewed. OpenOffice.org v2.x y v3.0 anterior v3.2.1 permite a atacantes remotos asistidos por usuarios supera las restricciones macro de seguridad de Python y ejecutar código Python de su elección a través de un fichero de texto OpenDocument manipulado lo cual ocasiona la ejecución de código cuando la estructura directorio macro es previsualizada. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-June/042468.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-June/042529.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-June/042534.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html http://secunia.com/advisories/40070 http://secunia.com/advisories/40084 http://secunia.com/advisories/40104 http://secunia.com/advisories/40107 http://secunia.com/advisories/41818 http:/ •

CVSS: 5.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0

CVE-2010-1634 – python: audioop: incorrect integer overflow checks

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-1634

Multiple integer overflows in audioop.c in the audioop module in Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1, and 3.2 allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a large fragment, as demonstrated by a call to audioop.lin2lin with a long string in the first argument, leading to a buffer overflow. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2008-3143.5. Múltiples desbordamientos de entero en audioop.c en el módulo audioop en Python v2.6, v2.7, v3.1 y v3.2, permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) a través de un fragmento largo, como se ha demostrado mediante una llamada audiolop.lin2lin con una cadena larga en el primer argumento, llevando a cabo un desbordamiento de búfer. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe por un incorrecto parcheado para la CVE-2008-3143.5. • http://bugs.python.org/issue8674 http://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2011//Oct/msg00003.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-June/042751.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-12/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00006.html http://secunia.com/advisories/39937 http://secunia.com/advisories/40194 http://secunia.com/advisories/42888 http://secunia.com/advisories/43068 http://sec • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •