Page 201 of 3354 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

18 Oct 2016 — Devtools in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.59 for Windows, Mac, and Linux; 54.0.2840.85 for Android incorrectly handled objects after a tab crash, which allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via crafted PDF files. Devtools en Google Chrome en versiones previas a 54.0.2840.59 para Windows, Mac y Linux; 54.0.2840.85 para Android maneja incorrectamente objetos después de una caída de pestaña, lo que permite a un atacante remoto llevar a cabo una lectura de memoria fuera de límites... • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2067.html • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

18 Oct 2016 — Blink in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.59 for Windows, Mac, and Linux; 54.0.2840.85 for Android incorrectly allowed reentrance of FrameView::updateLifecyclePhasesInternal(), which allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via crafted HTML pages. Blink en Google Chrome en versiones previas a 54.0.2840.59 para Windows, Mac y Linux; 54.0.2840.85 para Android incorrectamente permite la reentrada de FrameView::updateLifecyclePhasesInternal(), lo que permite a un atacante remoto llevar ... • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2067.html • CWE-416: Use After Free •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

18 Oct 2016 — Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.59 for Windows, Mac, and Linux; 54.0.2840.85 for Android incorrectly handled object lifecycles during shutdown, which allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via crafted HTML pages. Google Chrome en versiones previas a 54.0.2840.59 para Windows, Mac y Linux; 54.0.2840.85 para Android maneja incorrectamente los ciclos de vida de objetos durante el apagado, lo que permite a un atacante remoto llevar a cabo una lectura de memoria fuera de límites a tra... • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2067.html • CWE-416: Use After Free •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

18 Oct 2016 — Bookmark handling in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.59 for Windows, Mac, and Linux; 54.0.2840.85 for Android had insufficient validation of supplied data, which allowed a remote attacker to inject arbitrary scripts or HTML (UXSS) via crafted HTML pages, as demonstrated by an interpretation conflict between userinfo and scheme in an http://javascript:payload@example.com URL. El manejo de etiquetas en Google Chrome en versiones previas a 54.0.2840.59 para Windows, Mac y Linux; 54.0.2840.85 para Android tien... • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2067.html • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

18 Oct 2016 — Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.59 for Windows, Mac, and Linux; 54.0.2840.85 for Android permitted navigation to blob URLs with non-canonical origins, which allowed a remote attacker to spoof the contents of the Omnibox (URL bar) via crafted HTML pages. Google Chrome en versiones previas a 54.0.2840.59 para Windows, Mac y Linux; 54.0.2840.85 para Android permite la navegación para borrar URLs con orígenes irregulares, lo que permite a un atacante remoto suplantar contenidos de la Omnibox (barra de URL) a t... • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2067.html • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

18 Oct 2016 — Blink in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.59 for Windows, Mac, and Linux; 54.0.2840.85 for Android had insufficient validation in bitmap handling, which allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via crafted HTML pages. Blink en Google Chrome en versiones previas a 54.0.2840.59 para Windows, Mac y Linux; 54.0.2840.85 para Android tiene una validación insuficiente en el manejo de bitmap, lo que permite a un atacante remoto explotar potencialmente una corrupción de memoria a través de pá... • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2067.html • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

18 Oct 2016 — Google Chrome prior to 54.0 for iOS had insufficient validation of URLs for windows open by DOM, which allowed a remote attacker to bypass restrictions on navigation to certain URL schemes via crafted HTML pages. Google Chrome en versiones previas a 54.0 para iOS tiene una validación insuficiente de URLs para windows en ventanas abiertas por DOM, lo que permite a un atacante remoto eludir restricciones de navegación a ciertos esquemas de URL a través de páginas HTML manipuladas. Chromium is an open-source w... • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2067.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

18 Oct 2016 — PDFium in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.59 for Windows, Mac, and Linux; 54.0.2840.85 for Android incorrectly handled object lifecycles in CFFL_FormFillter::KillFocusForAnnot, which allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via crafted PDF files. PDFium en Google Chrome en versiones previas a 54.0.2840.59 para Windows, Mac y Linux; 54.0.2840.85 para Android maneja incorrectamente los ciclos de vida de objetos en CFFL_FormFillter::KillFocusForAnnot, lo que permite a un atacante remot... • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2067.html • CWE-416: Use After Free •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

18 Oct 2016 — Unspecified vulnerabilities in Google Chrome before 54.0.2840.59. Vulnerabilidades no especificadas en Google Chrome versiones anteriores a la versión 54.0.2840.59. It was discovered that a long running unload handler could cause an incognito profile to be reused in some circumstances. If a user were tricked in to opening a specially crafted website, an attacker could potentially exploit this to obtain sensitive information. Multiple security vulnerabilities were discovered in Chromium. • https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2016/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

14 Oct 2016 — SHA-1 is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of SHA-1 in TLS 1.2. NOTE: this CVE exists to provide a common identifier for referencing this SHA-1 issue; the existence of an identifier is not, by itself, a technology recommendation. SHA-1 no es resistente a la colisión, lo que facilita a atacantes dependientes del contexto llevar a cabo ataques de espionaje, como es demostrado por ataques en el uso d... • http://ia.cr/2007/474 • CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength •