CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 21EXPL: 0CVE-2010-0205 – libpng: excessive memory consumption due to highly compressed huge ancillary chunk
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-0205
The png_decompress_chunk function in pngrutil.c in libpng 1.0.x before 1.0.53, 1.2.x before 1.2.43, and 1.4.x before 1.4.1 does not properly handle compressed ancillary-chunk data that has a disproportionately large uncompressed representation, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption, and application hang) via a crafted PNG file, as demonstrated by use of the deflate compression method on data composed of many occurrences of the same character, related to a "decompression bomb" attack. La función png_decompress_chunk en pngrutil.c en libpng 1.0.x en versiones anteriores a la 1.0.53, 1.2.x en versiones anteriores a la 1.2.43 y1.4.x en versiones anteriores a la 1.4.1 no maneja adecuadamente los datos fragmentados auxiliares comprimidos que tienen una representación descomprimida desproporcionada, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de la CPU y de la memoria y cuelgue de la aplicación) mediante un fichero PNG manipulado, como ha quedado demostrado por el uso del método de decompresión con datos con muchas ocurrencias del mismo caracter, en relación con un ataque "decompression bomb" (bomba de descompresión). • http://libpng.sourceforge.net/ADVISORY-1.4.1.html http://libpng.sourceforge.net/decompression_bombs.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//Nov/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-March/037237.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-March/037355.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-March/037364.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-March/037607.html http:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 7%CPEs: 10EXPL: 1CVE-2010-0013 – Pidgin MSN 2.6.4 - File Download
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-0013
Directory traversal vulnerability in slp.c in the MSN protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidgin 2.6.4 and Adium 1.3.8 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in an application/x-msnmsgrp2p MSN emoticon (aka custom smiley) request, a related issue to CVE-2004-0122. NOTE: it could be argued that this is resultant from a vulnerability in which an emoticon download request is processed even without a preceding text/x-mms-emoticon message that announced availability of the emoticon. Vulnerabilidad de salto de directorio en slp.c en el complemento del protocolo MSN en libpurple en Pidgin v2.6.4 y Adium v1.3.8 permite a atacantes remotos leer ficheros de su elección a través de un .. (punto punto) en una petición emoticono MSN application/x-msnmsgrp2p (también conocido como emoticono personalizado), un caso relaciona con CVE-2004-0122. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/11203 http://d.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/3d02401cf232459fc80c0837d31e05fae7ae5467 http://d.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/4be2df4f72bd8a55cdae7f2554b73342a497c92f http://d.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/c64a1adc8bda2b4aeaae1f273541afbc4f71b810 http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/diff/3d02401cf232459fc80c0837d31e05fae7ae5467/with/c64a1adc8bda2b4aeaae1f273541afbc4f71b810/libpurple/protocols/msn/slp.c http://events.ccc.de/congress/2009/Fahrplan/events/3596.en.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/piperma • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 4.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0CVE-2009-4135
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-4135
The distcheck rule in dist-check.mk in GNU coreutils 5.2.1 through 8.1 allows local users to gain privileges via a symlink attack on a file in a directory tree under /tmp. La regla distcheck en dist-check.mk en GNU coreutils desde v5.2.1 hasta v8.1 permite a usuarios locales ganar privilegios a través de un ataque de enlace simbólico en un fichero que este en la carpeta /tmp. • http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/commit/?id=ae034822c535fa5 http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=126030454503441&w=2 http://secunia.com/advisories/37645 http://secunia.com/advisories/37860 http://secunia.com/advisories/62226 http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-coreutils%40gnu.org/msg18779.html http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-coreutils%40gnu.org/msg18787.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/12/08/4 http://www.osvdb.org/60853 http://www.sec • CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2009-2816
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-2816
The implementation of Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) in WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 4.0.4 and Google Chrome before 3.0.195.33, includes certain custom HTTP headers in the OPTIONS request during cross-origin operations with preflight, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a crafted web page. La implementación de Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) en WebKit, tal como es usado en Safari de Apple anterior a versión 4.0.4 y Chrome de Google anterior a versión 3.0.195.33, incluye ciertos encabezados HTTP personalizados en la petición OPTIONS durante operaciones entre orígenes con comprobación previa, lo que facilita a los atacantes remotos conducir ataques de tipo cross-site request forgery (CSRF) por medio de una página web especialmente diseñada. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2009/Nov/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010/Jun/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00006.html http://osvdb.org/59940 http://osvdb.org/59967 http://secunia.com/advisories/37346 http://secunia.com/advisories/37358 http://secunia.com/advisories/37393 http://secunia.com/advisories/37397 http://secunia.com/advisories/43068 http://support.apple.com/kb/HT39 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 21EXPL: 5CVE-2009-3555 – Mozilla NSS - NULL Character CA SSL Certificate Validation Security Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-3555
The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue. El protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL v3.0 y posiblemente versiones anteriores, tal y como se usa en Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) v7.0, mod_ssl en el servidor HTTP Apache v2.2.14 y anteriores, OpenSSL antes de v0.9.8l, GnuTLS v2.8.5 y anteriores, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) v3.12.4 y anteriores, y otros productos, no asocia apropiadamente la renegociación del Handshake SSL en una conexión existente, lo que permite ataques man-in-the-middle en los que el atacante inserta datos en sesiones HTTPS, y posiblemente otro tipo de sesiones protegidas por SSL o TLS, enviando una petición de autenticación que es procesada retroactivamente por un servidor en un contexto post-renegociación. Se trata de un ataque de "inyección de texto plano", también conocido como el problema del "Proyecto Mogul". • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10071 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10579 http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-11/0120.html http://blog.g-sec.lu/2009/11/tls-sslv3-renegotiation-vulnerability.html http://blogs.iss.net/archive/sslmitmiscsrf.html http://blogs.sun.com/security/entry/vulnerability_in_tls_protocol_during http://clicky.me/tlsvuln http://extendedsubset.com/?p=8 http://extendedsubset.com/Renegotiating_TLS.pdf http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsuppo • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •