Page 21 of 141 results (0.007 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 4%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0

qemu-nbd in QEMU (aka Quick Emulator) does not ignore SIGPIPE, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) by disconnecting during a server-to-client reply attempt. qemu-nbd en QEMU (Quick Emulator) no ignora la señal SIGPIPE, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio desconectando el proceso durante un intento de respuesta de servidor a cliente. Quick Emulator (QEMU) built with the Network Block Device (NBD) Server support is vulnerable to a crash via a SIGPIPE signal. The crash can occur if a client aborts a connection due to any failure during negotiation or read operation. A remote user/process could use this flaw to crash the qemu-nbd server resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3920 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/06/29/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99513 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2390 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2445 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3466 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3470 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3471 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3472 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RH • CWE-248: Uncaught Exception •

CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

libffi requests an executable stack allowing attackers to more easily trigger arbitrary code execution by overwriting the stack. Please note that libffi is used by a number of other libraries. It was previously stated that this affects libffi version 3.2.1 but this appears to be incorrect. libffi prior to version 3.1 on 32 bit x86 systems was vulnerable, and upstream is believed to have fixed this issue in version 3.1. libffi solicita una pila ejecutable que permite que los atacantes desencadenen con más facilidad la ejecución de código arbitrario sobrescribiendo la pila. Se debe tener en cuenta que libffi es empleado por otras bibliotecas. Antes se dijo que esto afecta a la versión 3.2.1 de libffi, pero parece ser incorrecto. libffi en versiones anteriores a la 3.1 en sistemas x86 de 32 bits era vulnerable y se cree que upstream ha solucionado este problema en la versión 3.1. • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3889 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-1000376 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0

Heap-based buffer overflow in Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA Emulator in Quick Emulator (Qemu) 2.8 and earlier allows local guest OS users to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (crash) via vectors related to a VNC client updating its display after a VGA operation. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica (heap) en Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA Emulator en Quick Emulator (Qemu) en versiones 2.8 y anteriores permite que los usuarios invitados del sistema operativo ejecuten código arbitrario o provoquen una denegación de servicio (DoS) mediante vectores relacionados con un cliente VNC que actualiza su display después de una operación VGA. An out-of-bounds r/w access issue was found in QEMU's Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA Emulator support. The vulnerability could occur while copying VGA data via various bitblt functions. A privileged user inside a guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process or, potentially, execute arbitrary code on the host with privileges of the QEMU process. • http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-3289-1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/04/21/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102129 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97955 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0980 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0981 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0982 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0983 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0984 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0988 https • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 0

An integer overflow in the implementation of the posix_memalign in memalign functions in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.26 and earlier could cause these functions to return a pointer to a heap area that is too small, potentially leading to heap corruption. Un desbordamiento de enteros en la implementación de posix_memalign en las funciones memalign en GNU C Library (también conocido como glibc o libc6) en versiones 2.26 y anteriores podría provocar que estas funciones devuelvan un puntero a un área de la memoria dinámica (heap) demasiado pequeña, pudiendo corromper el heap. • http://bugs.debian.org/878159 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102912 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3092 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190404-0003 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22343 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4218-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4416-1 https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-6485 https:/ • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 4

In glibc 2.26 and earlier there is confusion in the usage of getcwd() by realpath() which can be used to write before the destination buffer leading to a buffer underflow and potential code execution. En glibc 2.26 y anteriores existe una confusión en el uso de getcwd() por realpath(), que puede emplearse para escribir antes del búfer de destino. Esto conduce a un subdesbordamiento de búfer y a una potencial ejecución de código. glibc suffers from a getcwd() local privilege escalation vulnerability. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44889 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43775 https://github.com/0x00-0x00/CVE-2018-1000001 https://github.com/usernameid0/tools-for-CVE-2018-1000001 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q1/38 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102525 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040162 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0805 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190404-0003 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3534-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •