Page 21 of 105 results (0.016 seconds)

CVSS: 5.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 28EXPL: 3

The PTR_MANGLE implementation in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.4, 2.17, and earlier, and Embedded GLIBC (EGLIBC) does not initialize the random value for the pointer guard, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to control execution flow by leveraging a buffer-overflow vulnerability in an application and using the known zero value pointer guard to calculate a pointer address. La implementación PTR_MANGLE en la GNU C Library (librería también conocida como glibc o libc6) 2.4, 2.17 y versiones anteriores y Embedded GLIBC (EGLIBC) no inicia el valor aleatorio para la guardia de puntero, lo que facilita a atacantes dependientes del contexto controlar la ejecución de flujo aprovechando una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de búfer en una aplicación y utilizando el valor cero conocido guardia de puntero para calcular la dirección de puntero. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/28657 http://hmarco.org/bugs/CVE-2013-4788.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Sep/23 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:283 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:284 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/15/9 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/61183 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-04 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 16%CPEs: 36EXPL: 0

Stack-based buffer overflow in the getaddrinfo function in sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c in GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.17 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a (1) hostname or (2) IP address that triggers a large number of domain conversion results. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila en la función getaddrinfo en sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c en GNU C Library (tambien conocido como glibc o libc6) v2.17 y anteriores permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de la aplicación) a través de un (1) nombre de host o (2) una dirección IP que desencadenan un gran número de resultados en la conversión de dominio. It was found that getaddrinfo() did not limit the amount of stack memory used during name resolution. An attacker able to make an application resolve an attacker-controlled hostname or IP address could possibly cause the application to exhaust all stack memory and crash. Many Moxa devices suffer from command injection, cross site scripting, and outdated software vulnerabilities. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/164014/Moxa-Command-Injection-Cross-Site-Scripting-Vulnerable-Software.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0769.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1605.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/0 http://secunia.com/advisories/52817 http://secunia.com/advisories/55113 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15330 http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1cef1b19089528db11f221e938f60b9b048945d7 http://www.mandriva • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

Buffer overflow in the extend_buffers function in the regular expression matcher (posix/regexec.c) in glibc, possibly 2.17 and earlier, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and crash) via crafted multibyte characters. Desbordamiento de búfer en el metodo extend_buffers del comparador expresiónes regulares (posix / regexec.c) en glibc, posiblemente, v2.17 y anteriores, permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (corrupción de memoria y caída) mediante caracteres multibyte artesanales. A flaw was found in the regular expression matching routines that process multibyte character input. If an application utilized the glibc regular expression matching mechanism, an attacker could provide specially-crafted input that, when processed, would cause the application to crash. • http://osvdb.org/89747 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0769.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1605.html http://secunia.com/advisories/51951 http://secunia.com/advisories/55113 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15078 http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-01/msg00967.html http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:163 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/30/5 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57638 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 4.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

Multiple integer overflows in the (1) strtod, (2) strtof, (3) strtold, (4) strtod_l, and other unspecified "related functions" in stdlib in GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.16 allow local users to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow. Múltiples desbordamientos de entero en (1) strtod, (2) strtof, (3) strtold, (4) strtod_l, y otras "funciones relacionadas" no especificadas en stdlib en GNU C Library (también conocido como glibc o libc6) v2.16 permite a usuarios locales provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) y posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una cadena larga, lo que provoca un desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/37631 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-August/085190.html http://osvdb.org/84710 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1207.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1208.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1262.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1325.html http://secunia.com/advisories/50201 http://secunia.com/advisories/50422 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14459 htt • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-189: Numeric Errors •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations. Algunos mecanismos run-time de protección de memoria en la Librería C de GNU (también conocido como glibc o libc6) print argv[0] y backtrace information, lo cual permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto obtener información sensible de procesos de memoria mediante la ejecución de un programa incorrecto, como el demostrado por un programa setuid que contiene un error de desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila, relacionado con la función __fortify_fail en debug/fortify_fail.c, y las implementaciones __stack_chk_fail (también conocida como stack protection) y __chk_fail (también conocida como FORTIFY_SOURCE). • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •